Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Aleman, Alicia [1 ]
Tomasso, Giselle [1 ]
Luisa Cafferata, Maria [1 ]
Colomar, Mercedes [1 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Montevideo, Montevideo Clin & Res Unit, Avda Italia S-N, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[2] WHO, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF, World Bank Special Programme Res Dev & Res Traini, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Supply kits; Clean delivery kits; Pregnancy; Childbirth; Maternal mortality; Neonatal mortality; TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANTS; CLEAN DELIVERY-KIT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; NEONATAL TETANUS; UMBILICAL-CORD; HEALTH; QUALITY; INTERVENTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is critical to increase the uptake of interventions proven to be effective to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. Supply kits have been suggested to be a feasible strategy designed to ensure timely availability and effective follow-up of care. Objective: We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence on the uptake, effectiveness and safety of supply kits for maternal care. Search strategy: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, Campbell Collaboration, Lilacs, Embase and unpublished studies were searched. Selection criteria: Studies that reported the efficacy, safety and use of supply kits for maternal healthcare were eligible. Participants were pregnant women or in childbirth. Supply kits were defined as a collection of medicines, supplies or instruments packaged together with the aim of conducting a healthcare task. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and methodological and quality assessment. Main results: 24 studies were included: 4 of them were systematic reviews and 20 primary studies. Eighteen studies evaluated a so-called "clean delivery kit". In all but two studies, the kits were used by more than half of the participants. A meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the heterogeneity in study design, in the components of the interventions implemented, in the content of the kits, and in outcomes. Nine studies assessed neonatal outcomes and found statistically significant reductions in cord infection, sepsis and tetanus-related mortality in the intervention group. Three studies showed evidence of reduced neonatal mortality (OR 0.52, 0.60 and 0.71) with statistically significant confidence intervals in all cases. Four studies reported odd ratios for maternal mortality, but only one showed evidence of a statistically significant decrease in this outcome but it was ascribed to hand washing prior to childbirth and not with the use of kits. Conclusion: This review suggests potential benefits in the use of supply kits to improve maternal and neonatal health. However, the observational nature of the studies, the heterogeneity and the use of kits incorporated within complex interventions limit the interpretation of the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review
    Alicia Aleman
    Giselle Tomasso
    María Luisa Cafferata
    Mercedes Colomar
    Ana Pilar Betran
    Reproductive Health, 14
  • [2] Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach
    Colomar, Mercedes
    Cafferata, Maria Luisa
    Aleman, Alicia
    Tomasso, Giselle
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2017, 14
  • [3] Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.
    Mercedes Colomar
    Maria Luisa Cafferata
    Alicia Aleman
    Giselle Tomasso
    Ana Pilar Betran
    Reproductive Health, 14
  • [4] Effectiveness of birthing kits for clean childbirth: a systematic review
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Fisher, Zeshi
    Andraweera, Prabha
    Cummins, Alexandra
    Roberts, Claire T.
    INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2020, 12 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [5] Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence
    Hundley, Vanora A.
    Avan, Bilal I.
    Braunholtz, David
    Graham, Wendy J.
    MIDWIFERY, 2012, 28 (02) : 204 - 215
  • [6] Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in northern Ghana
    Duysburgh, E.
    Williams, A.
    Williams, J.
    Loukanova, S.
    Temmerman, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 117 - 126
  • [7] Current evidence on antenatal care provision for women with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Homeyard, Claire
    Montgomery, Elsa
    Chinn, Deborah
    Patelarou, Evridiki
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 32 : 45 - 57
  • [8] Enhanced Antenatal Care: Combining one-to-one and group Antenatal Care models to increase childbirth education and address childbirth fear
    Swift, Emma Marie
    Zoega, Helga
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Avery, Melissa
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [9] Effects of women's economic empowerment interventions on antenatal care outcomes: a systematic review
    Suh, Heezy
    Kalai, Shiri
    Trivedi, Niki
    Underwood, Carol
    Hendrickson, Zoe Mistrale
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [10] Antenatal fear of childbirth and emergency cesarean section delivery: a systematic narrative review
    Molgora, Sara
    Fenaroli, Valentina
    Cracolici, Elisa
    Saita, Emanuela
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 436 - 454