Performance of today's dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: A simulation study

被引:183
作者
Faby, Sebastian [1 ]
Kuchenbecker, Stefan [1 ]
Sawall, Stefan [1 ]
Simons, David [2 ]
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter [2 ]
Lell, Michael [3 ]
Kachelriess, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Med Phys Radiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Radiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
dual energy CT; multi energy CT; virtual non-contrast imaging; iodine imaging; photon counting detector; statistical material decomposition; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC APPARATUS; X-RAY-DETECTORS; ITERATIVE-RECONSTRUCTION; PULSE PILEUP; RENAL MASSES; ANGIOGRAPHY; SCANNER; MODEL; DIFFERENTIATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1118/1.4922654
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the performance of different dual energy computed tomography (DECT) techniques, which are available today, and future multi energy CT (MECT) employing novel photon counting detectors in an image-based material decomposition task. Methods: The material decomposition performance of different energy-resolved CT acquisition techniques is assessed and compared in a simulation study of virtual non-contrast imaging and iodine quantification. The material-specific images are obtained via a statistically optimal image-based material decomposition. A projection-based maximum likelihood approach was used for comparison with the authors' image-based method. The different dedicated dual energy CT techniques are simulated employing realistic noise models and x-ray spectra. The authors compare dual source DECT with fast kV switching DECT and the dual layer sandwich detector DECT approach. Subsequent scanning and a subtraction method are studied as well. Further, the authors benchmark future MECT with novel photon counting detectors in a dedicated DECT application against the performance of today's DECT using a realistic model. Additionally, possible dual source concepts employing photon counting detectors are studied. Results: The DECT comparison study shows that dual source DECT has the best performance, followed by the fast kV switching technique and the sandwich detector approach. Comparing DECT with future MECT, the authors found noticeable material image quality improvements for an ideal photon counting detector; however, a realistic detector model with multiple energy bins predicts a performance on the level of dual source DECT at 100 kV/Sn 140 kV. Employing photon counting detectors in dual source concepts can improve the performance again above the level of a single realistic photon counting detector and also above the level of dual source DECT. Conclusions: Substantial differences in the performance of today's DECT approaches were found for the application of virtual non-contrast and iodine imaging. Future MECT with realistic photon counting detectors currently can only perform comparably to dual source DECT at 100 kV/Sn 140 kV. Dual source concepts with photon counting detectors could be a solution to this problem, promising a better performance. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4349 / 4366
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] ENERGY-SELECTIVE RECONSTRUCTIONS IN X-RAY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
    ALVAREZ, RE
    MACOVSKI, A
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1976, 21 (05) : 733 - 744
  • [2] The Medipix3RX: a high resolution, zero dead-time pixel detector readout chip allowing spectroscopic imaging
    Ballabriga, R.
    Alozy, J.
    Blaj, G.
    Campbell, M.
    Fiederle, M.
    Frojdh, E.
    Heijne, E. H. M.
    Llopart, X.
    Pichotka, M.
    Procz, S.
    Tlustos, L.
    Wong, W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2013, 8
  • [3] UNDERSTANDING AND OPTIMIZING USE OF CONTRAST MATERIAL FOR CT OF THE LIVER
    BARON, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (02) : 323 - 331
  • [4] Virtual unenhanced second generation dual-source CT of the liver: Is it time to discard the conventional unenhanced phase?
    Barrett, T.
    Bowden, D. J.
    Shaida, N.
    Godfrey, E. M.
    Taylor, A.
    Lomas, D. J.
    Shaw, A. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (07) : 1438 - 1445
  • [5] Virtual Unenhanced Images of the Abdomen With Second-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Image Quality and Liver Lesion Detection
    De Cecco, Carlo Nicola
    Darnell, Anna
    Macias, Napoleon
    Ramon Ayuso, Juan
    Rodriguez, Sonia
    Rimola, Jordi
    Pages, Mario
    Garcia-Criado, Angeles
    Rengo, Marco
    Laghi, Andrea
    Ayuso, Carmen
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [6] Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images
    De Cecco, Carlo Nicola
    Buffa, Vitaliano
    Fedeli, Stefano
    Luzietti, Monica
    Vallone, Andrea
    Ruopoli, Roberto
    Miele, Vittorio
    Rengo, Marco
    Paolantonio, Pasquale
    Enrici, Michelangelo Maurizi
    Laghi, Andrea
    David, Vincenzo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (12) : 2870 - 2875
  • [7] TISSUE SIGNATURES WITH DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    DICHIRO, G
    BROOKS, RA
    KESSLER, RM
    JOHNSTON, GS
    JONES, AE
    HERDT, JR
    SHERIDAN, WT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1979, 131 (02) : 521 - 523
  • [8] Efficient and accurate likelihood for iterative image reconstruction in x-ray computed tomography
    Elbakri, LA
    Fessler, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5032 : 1839 - 1850
  • [9] CT calibration and dose minimization in image-based material decomposition with energy-selective detectors
    Faby, Sebastian
    Kuchenbecker, Stefan
    Simons, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Lell, Michael
    Kachelriess, Marc
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 9033
  • [10] Iodine Quantification Using Dual-Energy Multidetector Computed Tomography Imaging Phantom Study Assessing the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction Schemes and Patient Habitus on Accuracy
    Feuerlein, Sebastian
    Heye, Tobias J.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (11) : 656 - 661