Modeling of forward osmosis process using artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict the permeate flux

被引:101
作者
Jawad, Jasir [1 ]
Hawari, Alaa H. [2 ]
Zaidi, Syed [1 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Ctr Adv Mat, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Artificial neural network; Forward osmosis; Water treatment; Desalination; Machine learning; WATER DESALINATION; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; DRAW SOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; RO; OPTIMIZATION; TEMPERATURE; SIMULATION; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2020.114427
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Artificial neural networks (ANN) are black box models that are becoming more popular than transport-based models due to their high accuracy and less computational time in predictions. The literature shows a lack of ANN models to evaluate the forward osmosis (FO) process performance. Therefore, in this study, a multi-layered neural network model is developed to predict the permeate flux in forward osmosis. The developed model is tested for its generalization capability by including lab-scale experimental data from several published studies. Nine input variables are considered including membrane type, the orientation of membrane, molarity of feed solution and draw solution, type of feed solution and draw solution, crossflow velocity of the feed solution, and the draw solution and temperature of the feed solution and the draw solution. The development of optimum network architecture is supported by studying the impact of the number of neurons and hidden layers on the neural network performance. The optimum trained network shows a high R-2 value of 97.3% that is the efficiency of the model to predict the targeted output. Furthermore, the validation and generalized prediction capability of the model is tested against untrained published data. The performance of the ANN model is compared with a transport-based model in the literature. A simple machine learning technique such as a multiple linear regression (MLR) model is also applied in a similar manner to be compared with the ANN model. ANN demonstrates its ability to form a complex relationship between inputs and output better than MLR.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Modeling of an RO water desalination unit using neural networks [J].
Abbas, A ;
Al-Bastaki, N .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 114 (1-3) :139-143
[2]   Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications [J].
Achilli, Andrea ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. ;
Childress, Amy E. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2010, 364 (1-2) :233-241
[3]   Mathematical and optimization modelling in desalination: State-of-the-art and future direction [J].
Ahmed, Farah Ejaz ;
Hashaikeh, Raed ;
Diabat, Ali ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2019, 469
[4]   Artificial neural network approach for predicting reverse osmosis desalination plants performance in the Gaza Strip [J].
Aish, Adnan M. ;
Zaqoot, Hossam A. ;
Abdeljawad, Samaher M. .
DESALINATION, 2015, 367 :240-247
[5]  
Al-Shayji K.A., 1998, SIMULATION OPTIMIZAT, DOI [10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.019, DOI 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2006.06.019]
[6]   Predictive modeling of large-scale commercial water desalination plants: Data-based neural network and model-based process simulation [J].
Al-Shayji, KA ;
Liu, YA .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (25) :6460-6474
[7]   Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler-Kedem model [J].
Al-Zoubi, H. ;
Hilal, N. ;
Darwish, N. A. ;
Mohammad, A. W. .
DESALINATION, 2007, 206 (1-3) :42-60
[8]  
Allison P.D., 1999, STAT MED, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.895
[9]   Forward osmosis research trends in desalination and wastewater treatment: A review of research trends over the past decade [J].
Ang, Wei Lun ;
Mohammad, Abdul Wahab ;
Johnson, Daniel ;
Hilal, Nidal .
JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2019, 31
[10]   Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: the case of phosphate removal [J].
Aydiner, C ;
Demir, I ;
Yildiz, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 248 (1-2) :53-62