Molecular Mechanism for the Regulation of ABA Homeostasis During Plant Development and Stress Responses

被引:148
|
作者
Ma, Yanlin [1 ]
Cao, Jing [1 ]
He, Jiahan [1 ]
Chen, Qiaoqiao [1 ]
Li, Xufeng [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Life Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Bioresources & Ecoenvironm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ABA production; ABA inactivation; ABA transporter; ABA homoeostasis; transcriptional regulation; stress response; ABSCISIC-ACID BIOSYNTHESIS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; SEED DORMANCY; 9-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; KEY ENZYME; GENE; TRANSPORTER; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASE; CELL;
D O I
10.3390/ijms19113643
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) play essential roles in numerous physiological processes such as seed dormancy, seed germination, seeding growth and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Such biological processes are tightly controlled by a complicated regulatory network including ABA homoeostasis, signal transduction as well as cross-talking among other signaling pathways. It is known that ABA homoeostasis modulated by its production, inactivation, and transport pathways is considered to be of great importance for plant development and stress responses. Most of the enzymes and transporters involved in ABA homoeostasis have been largely characterized and they all work synergistically to maintain ABA level in plants. Increasing evidence have suggested that transcriptional regulation of the genes involved in either ABA production or ABA inactivation plays vital roles in ABA homoeostasis. In addition to transcription factors, such progress is also regulated by microRNAs and newly characterized root to shoot mobile peptide-receptor like kinase (RLKs) mediated long-distance signal transduction. Thus, ABA contents are always kept in a dynamic balance. In this review, we survey recent research on ABA production, inactivation and transport pathways, and summarize some latest findings about the mechanisms that regulate ABA homoeostasis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Molecular genetic analyses of abiotic stress responses during plant reproductive development
    Ma, Xinwei
    Su, Zhao
    Ma, Hong
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2020, 71 (10) : 2870 - 2885
  • [2] Transcriptional regulation of bHLH during plant response to stress
    Sun, Xi
    Wang, Yu
    Sui, Na
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 503 (02) : 397 - 401
  • [3] ABA responses during seed development and germination
    Nonogaki, Hiroyuki
    ABSCISIC ACID IN PLANTS, 2019, 92 : 171 - 217
  • [4] Chromatin regulation functions in plant abiotic stress responses
    Kim, Jong-Myong
    To, Taiko K.
    Nishioka, Tatsuya
    Seki, Motoaki
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 33 (04) : 604 - 611
  • [5] Mechanisms of ROS Regulation of Plant Development and Stress Responses
    Huang, Honglin
    Ullah, Farhan
    Zhou, Dao-Xiu
    Yi, Ming
    Zhao, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [6] Regulation of RNA Metabolism in Plant Development and Stress Responses
    Jung, Hyun Ju
    Park, Su Jung
    Kang, Hunseung
    JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2013, 56 (03) : 123 - 129
  • [7] Multiple roles of NAC transcription factors in plant development and stress responses
    Xiong, Haiyan
    He, Haidong
    Chang, Yu
    Miao, Binbin
    Liu, Zhiwei
    Wang, Qianqian
    Dong, Faming
    Xiong, Lizhong
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2025, : 510 - 538
  • [8] The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses
    Danquah, Agyemang
    de Zelicourt, Axel
    Colcombet, Jean
    Hirt, Heribert
    BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2014, 32 (01) : 40 - 52
  • [9] Roles of malic enzymes in plant development and stress responses
    Sun, Xi
    Han, Guoliang
    Meng, Zhe
    Lin, Lin
    Sui, Na
    PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 14 (10)
  • [10] Coordination of ABA and Chaperone Signaling in Plant Stress Responses
    Bulgakov, Victor P.
    Wu, Hui-Chen
    Jinn, Tsung-Luo
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 24 (07) : 636 - 651