Knowledge Brokers in Crisis: Public Communication of Science During the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:8
作者
Martini, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Battisti, Davide [3 ,4 ]
Bina, Federico [1 ]
Consolandi, Monica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Via Olgettina 58, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Helsinki, Ctr Philosophy Social Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Insubria, IRCCS Osped San Raffaele Sci Inst, Varese, Italy
[4] Univ Insubria, Res Ctr Clin Eth, Varese, Italy
关键词
Knowledge brokers; science communication; Covid-19; Italy;
D O I
10.1080/02691728.2022.2116961
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Knowledge brokers are among the main channels of communication between scientists and the public and a key element to establishing a relation of trust between the two. But translating knowledge from the scientific community to a wider audience presents several difficulties, which can be accentuated in times of crisis. In this paper we study some of the problems that knowledge brokers face when communicating in times of crisis. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we collected interviews with Italian experts that played a major role as knowledge brokers in the local media. We asked them questions about five main topics: the features and role of science communicators; the use of language in communicating science; the importance of the relation of trust with the public; the peculiarity of communicating in a context of emergency; the problem of disagreement among experts, and its public perception and communication. The goal of this paper is to understand, through the words of knowledge brokers themselves, what they consider as best practices (and obstacles) to create trust between scientists and the public. Our empirical work can inform normative accounts of what knowledge brokering should be about.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 669
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Adams W. C., 2015, Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, P492, DOI [10.1002/9781119171386.ch19, DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19]
[2]  
Angner Erik, 2020, Epistemic Humility: Knowing Your Limits in aPandemic
[3]   The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics [J].
Brown, Mark B. .
MINERVA, 2008, 46 (04) :485-489
[4]   In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication [J].
Chinn, Sedona ;
Lane, Daniel S. ;
Philip, S. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (07) :807-823
[5]   Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour [J].
DeJonckheere, Melissa ;
Vaughn, Lisa M. .
FAMILY MEDICINE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2019, 7 (02)
[6]   Science Education in the Era of a Pandemic How Can History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science Contribute to Education for Understanding and Solving the Covid-19 Crisis? [J].
Erduran, Sibel .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2020, 29 (02) :233-235
[7]  
Evans R.J., 2010, TRADING ZONES INTERA, P53, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/8351.003.0005
[8]  
Heath R L., 2020, Handbook of risk and crisis communication
[9]  
Institute of Medicine, 2006, MOD COMM CONT PAND I
[10]   Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty [J].
John, Stephen .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) :75-87