ARISTOTLE AND RICOEUR ON PRACTICAL REASON

被引:0
作者
Marcelo, Goncalo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, CECH, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Catolica Porto Business Sch, Porto, Portugal
来源
HUMANITAS-PORTUGAL | 2020年 / 76卷
关键词
Aristotle; phronesis; practical reason; Ricoeur;
D O I
10.14195/2183-1718_76_8
中图分类号
I [文学];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the Aristotelian notion of phronesis, such as it appears in Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics, detailing what sort of model to grasp practical reason it entails: a practical wisdom. Setting it against the backdrop of a reflection on the prevalent uses and meanings of reason today, and the consequences these views have for a depiction of selfhood and human action, the paper shows how, amid the contemporary revival of Aristotelian practical philosophy, Paul Ricoeur updates this phronetic model in Oneself as Another. The paper discusses the implications of such a thick account of selfhood and human action, such as it being a potential key to overcome some difficulties caused by Kantian moral philosophy, while it also calls, with and beyond Ricoeur, for a refinement of the phronetic model by taking into account not only its thick intersubjective grounding but also the limits to rationality and the need to take the plurality of life forms that can count as being examples of a `life worth living' (a good life).
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Angioni L., 2009, REV FILOSOFICA COIMB, V18, P185, DOI [10.14195/0872-0851_35_6, DOI 10.14195/0872-0851_35_6]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, LIBERALISM LIMITS JU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity
[4]  
Aristotle, 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST, P1729, DOI [10.1515/9781400835850-011, DOI 10.1515/9781400835850-011]
[5]   Anscombe reading Aristotle [J].
Cadilha, Susana .
ENRAHONAR-QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA, 2020, (64) :63-79
[6]   Tact, promise and conviction Ethical combination of tradition and innovation in Paul Ricoeur [J].
Contreras Tasso, Beatriz .
ETUDES RICOEURIENNES-RICOEUR STUDIES, 2011, 2 (02) :33-47
[7]  
Galindo F. H. P., 2013, BIOETICA HERMENEUTIC, P289
[8]  
Jaeggi, 2018, CRITIQUE FORMS LIFE
[9]  
John Rawls, 1971, A Theory of Justice
[10]  
Kahneman D., 2002, Thinking, fast and slow, V49, P74