Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers

被引:129
作者
Park, Sung Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Dae Chul [1 ,2 ]
Oh, Young Taik [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nam Hoon [3 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [4 ]
Rha, Koon Ho [4 ,5 ]
Hong, Sung Joon [4 ]
Han, Kyunghwa
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Avison Biomed Res Ctr, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TARGETED BIOPSY; SCORING SYSTEM; GUIDED BIOPSY; MRI; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.16151133
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score >= 4 or not) was investigated by using k statistics. Results: At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PIRADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted k = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion: The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (C) RSNA, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 116
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
American Collage of Radiology, PI RADS V2
[2]   Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Validation Cohort Study with Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping as the Reference Standard [J].
Arumainayagam, Nimalan ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Sohaib, S. Aslam ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) :761-769
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]   Advancements in MR Imaging of the Prostate: From Diagnosis to Interventions [J].
Bonekamp, David ;
Jacobs, Michael A. ;
El-Khouli, Riham ;
Stoianovici, Dan ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2011, 31 (03) :677-703
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and MR-guided Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: A Modelling Study from a Health Care Perspective [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Crienen, Simone ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. ;
Grutters, Janneke P. C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) :430-436
[6]   Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading [J].
Dong, Fei ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Stephenson, Andrew J. ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Reuther, Alwyn M. ;
Klein, Eric A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) :896-900
[7]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[8]   Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
De Visschere, Pieter ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Thoeny, Harriet ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Villers, Arnauld .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) :1045-1053
[9]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[10]   Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis [J].
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) :1112-1121