Longitudinal Noninvasive Imaging of Progesterone Receptor as a Predictive Biomarker of Tumor Responsiveness to Estrogen Deprivation Therapy

被引:29
作者
Chan, Szeman Ruby [1 ]
Fowler, Amy M. [2 ]
Allen, Julie A. [1 ]
Zhou, Dong [3 ]
Dence, Carmen S. [3 ]
Sharp, Terry L. [3 ]
Fettig, Nicole M. [3 ]
Dehdashti, Farrokh [3 ]
Katzenellenbogen, John A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Div Radiol Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Chem, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; IN-VIVO; ANASTROZOLE; EXPRESSION; ESTRADIOL; CARCINOMA; TAMOXIFEN; LIGANDS; KI-67;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1715
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether longitudinal functional PET imaging of mammary tumors using the radiopharmaceuticals [F-18] FDG (to measure glucose uptake), [F-18] FES [to measure estrogen receptor (ER) levels], or [F-18] FFNP [to measure progesterone receptor (PgR) levels] is predictive of response to estrogendeprivation therapy. Experimental Design: [F-18] FDG, [F-18] FES, and [F-18] FFNP uptake in endocrine-sensitive and -resistant mammary tumors was quantified serially by PET before ovariectomy or estrogen withdrawal in mice, and on days 3 and 4 after estrogen-deprivation therapy. Specificity of [F-18] FFNP uptake in ERa_ mammary tumors was determined by competition assay using unlabeled ligands for PgR or glucocorticoid receptor (GR). PgR expression was also assayed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: The levels of [F-18] FES and [F-18] FDG tumor uptake remained unchanged in endocrine-sensitive tumors after estro-gen-deprivation therapy compared with those at pretreatment. In contrast, estrogen-deprivation therapy led to a reduction in PgR expression and [F-18] FFNP uptake in endocrine-sensitive tumors, but not in endocrine-resistant tumors, as early as 3 days after treatment; the changes in PgR levels were confirmed by IHC. Unlabeled PgR ligand R5020 but not GR ligand dexamethasone blocked [F-18] FFNP tumor uptake, indicating that [F-18] FFNP bound specifically to PgR. Therefore, a reduction in FFNP tumor to muscle ratio in mammary tumors predicts sensitivity to estrogen-deprivation therapy. Conclusions: Monitoring the acute changes in ERa activity by measuring [F-18] FFNP uptake in mammary tumors predicts tumor response to estrogen-deprivation therapy. Longitudinal noninvasive PET imaging using [F-18] FFNP is a robust and effective approach to predict tumor responsiveness to endocrine treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1070
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Ductal carcinoma in situ and the emergence of diversity during breast cancer evolution [J].
Allred, D. Craig ;
Wu, Yun ;
Mao, Sufeng ;
Nagtegaal, Iris D. ;
Lee, Sangjun ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Mohsin, Syed K. ;
O'Connell, Peter ;
Tsimelzon, Anna ;
Medina, Dan .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (02) :370-378
[2]   Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC) [J].
Arnedos, M. ;
Nerurkar, A. ;
Osin, P. ;
A'Hern, R. ;
Smith, I. E. ;
Dowsett, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (12) :1948-1952
[3]   FLUORINE-18-LABELED PROGESTIN 16A,L7A-DIOXOLANES - DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-AFFINITY LIGANDS FOR THE PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR WITH HIGH IN-VIVO TARGET SITE SELECTIVITY [J].
BUCKMAN, BO ;
BONASERA, TA ;
KIRSCHBAUM, KS ;
WELCH, MJ ;
KATZENELLENBOGEN, JA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 38 (02) :328-337
[4]   Correlation between Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and 18F-Fluorothymidine uptake in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chalkidou, A. ;
Landau, D. B. ;
Odell, E. W. ;
Cornelius, V. R. ;
O'Doherty, M. J. ;
Marsden, P. K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (18) :3499-3513
[5]   Dysregulated STAT1-SOCS1 control of JAK2 promotes mammary luminal progenitor cell survival and drives ERα+ tumorigenesis [J].
Chan, S. R. ;
Rickert, C. G. ;
Vermi, W. ;
Sheehan, K. C. F. ;
Arthur, C. ;
Allen, J. A. ;
White, J. M. ;
Archambault, J. ;
Lonardi, S. ;
McDevitt, T. M. ;
Bhattacharya, D. ;
Lorenzi, M. V. ;
Allred, D. C. ;
Schreiber, R. D. .
CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2014, 21 (02) :234-246
[6]   STAT1-deficient mice spontaneously develop estrogen receptor α-positive luminal mammary carcinomas [J].
Chan, Szeman Ruby ;
Vermi, William ;
Luo, Jingqin ;
Lucini, Laura ;
Rickert, Charles ;
Fowler, Amy M. ;
Lonardi, Silvia ;
Arthur, Cora ;
Young, Larry J. T. ;
Levy, David E. ;
Welch, Michael J. ;
Cardiff, Robert D. ;
Schreiber, Robert D. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (01)
[7]   Assessment of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Carcinoma by PET with 21-18F-Fluoro-16α,17α-[(R)-(1′-α-furylmethylidene)Dioxy]-19-Norpregn-4-Ene-3,20-Dione [J].
Dehdashti, Farrokh ;
Laforest, Richard ;
Gao, Feng ;
Aft, Rebecca L. ;
Dence, Carmen S. ;
Zhou, Dong ;
Shoghi, Kooresh I. ;
Siegel, Barry A. ;
Katzenellenbogen, John A. ;
Welch, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (03) :363-370
[8]   PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Dehdashti, Farrokh ;
Mortimer, Joanne E. ;
Trinkaus, Kathryn ;
Naughton, Michael J. ;
Ellis, Matthew ;
Katzenellenbogen, John A. ;
Welch, Michael J. ;
Siegel, Barry A. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 113 (03) :509-517
[9]  
Dowsett M, 2005, CLIN CANCER RES, V11, p951S
[10]   Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
A'Hern, Roger ;
Bartlett, John ;
Coombes, R. Charles ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Ellis, Matthew ;
Henry, N. Lynn ;
Hugh, Judith C. ;
Lively, Tracy ;
McShane, Lisa ;
Paik, Soon ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
Prudkin, Ljudmila ;
Regan, Meredith ;
Salter, Janine ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Smith, Ian E. ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (22) :1656-1664