Comparative in vivo study of alloy titanium implants with two different surfaces: biomechanical and SEM analysis

被引:7
作者
Souza, Francisley Avila [1 ,2 ]
Mata Furtado, Thayane Silveira [3 ]
Campos Dayube, Ulisses Ribeiro [3 ]
Melo, Willian Moraes [1 ,2 ]
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [4 ]
Poli, Pier Paolo [5 ]
Maiorana, Carlo [5 ]
Perri de Carvalho, Paulo Sergio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Integrated Clin, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Sao Leopoldo Mand Sch Dent & Res Ctr, Implant Dent Postgrad Program, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Mat Dent & Prosthesis, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Maggiore Policlin Hosp, Implant Ctr Edentulism & Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surg & Odontostomatol Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
Biomechanics; Dental implant; Osseointegration; Surface modification; SCANNING-ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY; REMOVAL TORQUE; BONE TISSUE; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ALUMINUM-OXIDE; TI IMPLANTS; PURE; ACID; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-019-02872-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the interface formed between bone and implants with machined surfaces (MS) and those modified by Al2O3 sandblasting and acid etching (SBAS). Materials and methods Before surgery, topographic characterization was performed by SEM-EDX and by mean roughness measurements. Ten Albinus rabbits received randomly 20 Ti-6Al-4V implants on its right and left tibiae, with one implant placed in each tibia. After implant insertion, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). After 3 and 6 weeks, the ISQ was again measured, followed by torque removal measurements. Analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data. The surface of the implants removed was evaluated by SEM-EDX. Immunohistochemical analysis of osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin (OC) protein was performed in bone tissue. Results The topographic characterization showed differences between the analyzed surfaces, and the mean roughness values of SBAS group were statistically higher than MS. Overall, higher statistically significant ISQ values were observed in the SBAS group compared to the MS group (p = 0.012). The intra-group comparison of ISQ values in the SBAS group showed statistically significant differences between 0 and 3 weeks (p = 0.032) and 0 and 6 weeks (p = 0.003). The torque removal measurements of group SBAS were statistically higher when compared with the torque removal measurements of group MS in the time intervals of 3 weeks (p = 0.002) and 6 weeks (p < 0.001). SEM-EDX of the implant surfaces removed in SBAS group showed greater bone tissue covering and mean values atomic in percentage of Ca, P, and O statistically superior (p < 0.05) than MS group. Immunohistochemical reactions showed intense OC immunolabeling at 6 weeks postoperative for SBAS group. Conclusions The topographical modifications made in group SBAS allowed a better mechanical interlocking between the implant and bone tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:4383 / 4397
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW
    ADELL, R
    LEKHOLM, U
    ROCKLER, B
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06): : 387 - 416
  • [2] ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
  • [3] Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
  • [4] OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR ENSURING A LONG-LASTING, DIRECT BONE-TO-IMPLANT ANCHORAGE IN MAN
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    BRANEMARK, PI
    HANSSON, HA
    LINDSTROM, J
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 52 (02): : 155 - 170
  • [5] A MULTICENTER REPORT ON OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1988, 60 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [6] Beier Ulrike Stephanie, 2014, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V35, pe1
  • [7] BRANEMARK P I, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, V3, P81
  • [8] Buser D, 1998, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V13, P611
  • [9] Buser D, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V45, P75, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-P