Public Perceptions on the Procedural Values and Proposed Outcomes of the Finnish Climate Change Act Amendment

被引:1
作者
Albrecht, Eerika [1 ]
Pietila, Iikka [2 ]
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka [3 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Management & Business, Law Sch, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland
[3] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
来源
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE | 2022年 / 3卷
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
climate policy; public perception; procedural justice; carbon neutrality; Finnish Climate Change Act; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL-JUSTICE; ADAPTATION; DISCOURSE; SUSTAINABILITY; INVOLVEMENT; MITIGATION; KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3389/fclim.2021.657241
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article examines the public perceptions on the drafting process of Finnish Climate Act amendment, which is a legislation on the climate policy that aims to mitigate climate change and secure adaptive capacity. In this paper we present results of a thematic analysis, which reveals citizens' perceptions of the procedural values, with respect to transparency, participation, and acceptance, and the objectives of the amendment, such as the climate neutrality target for 2035. The research data consisted of 2,458 answers to a citizen survey on the Finnish Climate Change Act amendment. Our results reveal that the opinions of citizens ranged from highlighting the urgency of political action to climate denials, with varying perceptions on process and proposed outcomes. While over half of citizens felt positively about the 2035 climate neutrality target created in the Climate Change Amendment Act, only a third believed that there was appropriate opportunity for public participation in the amendment process. Based on these findings, we suggest that participatory and transparent processes in legislative drafting are prerequisites for the sustainability transition and the implementation of international climate mitigation targets.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   'just sustainability': the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? [J].
Agyeman, J ;
Evans, B .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 170 :155-164
[2]  
Ahtonen R, 2012, IMPACT STAKEHOLDERS
[3]   Arguments and their effects - A case study on drafting the legislation on the environmental impacts of peat extraction in Finland [J].
Airaksinen, Jussi ;
Albrecht, Eerika .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 226 :1004-1012
[4]  
Albrecht E., 2020, Maapallon tulevaisuus ja lapsen oikeudet, P99
[5]  
Albrecht E., YOUTH PARTICIPATION, V25, P46
[6]  
Albrecht E, 2020, ILMASTOPOLITIIKAN HY, V369, P369
[7]  
Allaste AA, 2017, ROUT INT HANDB, P308
[8]  
Allen M., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C an IPCC Special Report
[9]   Media, Politics and Climate Change: Towards a New Research Agenda [J].
Anderson, Alison .
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2009, 3 (02) :166-182
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ENVIRON CONSERV, V19, P366