Institutional basis for research boom: From catch-up development to advanced economy

被引:12
作者
Ahn, Sang-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Sci & Technol Evaluat & Planning, Off Strateg Foresight, Seoul 06775, South Korea
关键词
Technological forecasting; Innovation policy; Catch-up development; Value chain; Logic model; Research boom; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; FORESIGHT; POLICY; CAPABILITY; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; GROWTH; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Historical best practice emphasizes that the decision for large-scale R&D investment is important to catch-up growth. It is desirable in most developing countries to establish coherence between technological forecasting and science, technology, and innovation policies. This study demonstrates that national foresight has disadvantages in implementing such policies because of insufficient monetized information with discriminant power for investment. To compensate for such disadvantages, a logic model is indispensable, and can be achieved by subsequent foresight at the time of each decision rather than by one-time national foresight. The example of the Korean government emphasizes that decision-making involving consecutive value-based technological forecasting can act as an institutional framework to progress from catch-up development to being an advanced economy. Despite a tradition against aggressive R&D investment in Korea, quantitative ex-ante evaluations with a feasible value chain have given the financial authorities' confidence. This is what has made Korea's research boom possible. If developing or transition countries plan to achieve catch-up growth by expanding R&D investment, the institutional cases in this study will be an important reference. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Emerging technologies-beyond the chasm: Assessing technological forecasting and its implication for innovation management in Korea [J].
An, Hyoung Joon ;
Ahn, Sang-Jin .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 102 :132-142
[2]   Innovation system foresight [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Andersen, Per Dannemand .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 88 :276-286
[3]   The Great Future Debate and the Struggle for the World [J].
Andersson, Jenny .
AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2012, 117 (05) :1411-1430
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HDB TECHNOLOGY FORES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Technology Imperative
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INNOVATION E ASIA CH
[7]   The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries - Windows of opportunity or further burden? [J].
Archibugi, D ;
Pietrobelli, C .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2003, 70 (09) :861-883
[8]  
Army Technology, 2015, KAI S KOR GOV SIGN L
[9]  
Barre R., 2008, FUTURE ORIENTED TECH
[10]   Learning through experience in Research & Development: An empirical analysis with Spanish firms [J].
Beneito, Pilar ;
Engracia Rochina-Barrachina, Maria ;
Sanchis, Amparo .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 88 :290-305