The correction for attenuation

被引:180
作者
Muchinsky, PM
机构
[1] University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC
[2] Dept. of Business Administration, Joseph M. Bryan Sch. Bus. and Econ., Univ. of N. Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0013164496056001004
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article examines the statistical correction for attenuation and the controversies surrounding the procedure. Although originally developed for test construction purposes, the correction for attenuation is also used in meta-analysis and assessments of validity generalization. Since Spearman's classic article in 1904, correct use and interpretation of the correction for attenuation has been debated. The logic of the double and single correction formulae is discussed as well as the correction producing validity coefficients greater than 1.00. Three types of misapplications and misinterpretations of the correction in published literature are presented. The article concludes with arguments pertaining to the use of the correction formula, and it attempts to sharpen the focus of issues that have led to differences of opinion about its meaning and purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 75
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]  
Magnusson D, 1967, TEST THEORY
[22]   CORRECTIONS FOR ATTENUATION AND RANGE RESTRICTION ON THE PREDICTOR [J].
MENDOZA, JL ;
MUMFORD, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STATISTICS, 1987, 12 (03) :282-293
[24]  
Nunnally J., 1978, Psychometric theory
[25]  
OUMLIL AB, 1986, J BUS RES, V14, P355
[26]   A NEW APPROACH FOR UTILITY ANALYSIS [J].
RAJU, NS ;
NORMAND, J ;
BURKE, MJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (01) :3-12
[27]   WHAT WOULD-BE IF WHAT IS WASNT - REJOINDER [J].
RAJU, NS ;
BURKE, MJ ;
NORMAND, J ;
LEZOTTE, DV .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (06) :912-916
[28]  
Rosenthal R., 1984, META ANALYTIC PROCED
[29]  
SACKETT PR, 1985, PERS PSYCHOL, V38, P697
[30]  
Schmidt F.L., 1985, PERS PSYCHOL, V38, P697, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1985.TB00565.X