The correction for attenuation

被引:180
作者
Muchinsky, PM
机构
[1] University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC
[2] Dept. of Business Administration, Joseph M. Bryan Sch. Bus. and Econ., Univ. of N. Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0013164496056001004
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article examines the statistical correction for attenuation and the controversies surrounding the procedure. Although originally developed for test construction purposes, the correction for attenuation is also used in meta-analysis and assessments of validity generalization. Since Spearman's classic article in 1904, correct use and interpretation of the correction for attenuation has been debated. The logic of the double and single correction formulae is discussed as well as the correction producing validity coefficients greater than 1.00. Three types of misapplications and misinterpretations of the correction in published literature are presented. The article concludes with arguments pertaining to the use of the correction formula, and it attempts to sharpen the focus of issues that have led to differences of opinion about its meaning and purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 75
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 1985, Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOMETRIKA
[3]  
[Anonymous], METHODS METAANALYSIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Standards for educational and psychological tests
[5]  
BATEMAN TS, 1984, ACAD MANAGE J, V27, P95, DOI 10.5465/255959
[6]  
Birnbaum A., 1968, LATENT TRAIT MODELS
[8]   TEST "RELIABILITY": ITS MEANING AND DETERMINATION [J].
Cronbach, Lee J. .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1947, 12 (01) :1-16
[9]   THE DEFINITION AND ESTIMATION OF TEST RELIABILITY [J].
CURETON, EE .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1958, 18 (04) :715-738
[10]   THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL - A REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS [J].
FRIED, Y ;
FERRIS, GR .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (02) :287-322