Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Agriculture Green Total Factor Productivity in China, 1998-2016: Based on More Sophisticated Calculations of Carbon Emissions

被引:89
作者
Xu, Xiaocang [1 ]
Huang, Xiuquan [1 ]
Huang, Jun [2 ]
Gao, Xin [3 ]
Chen, Linhong [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Res Ctr Econ Upper Reaches Yangtse River, Sch Econ, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[2] China Minsheng Bank Chengdu, Background Operat Ctr Credit Card, Chengdu 610100, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
green total factor productivity; agricultural carbon emissions; spatio-temporal differentiation; spatial correlation; time evolution; carbon sources; EFFICIENCY; FOOTPRINT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph16203932
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental costs should be taken into account when measuring the achievements of China's agricultural development, since the long-term extensive development of agriculture has caused huge environmental pollution. This study took agricultural carbon emissions as an undesired output to estimate the agricultural development efficiency in 31 provinces of China from 1998 to 2016, based on the green total factor productivity, as assessed by the slacks-based measure directional distance function and constructing the global Malmquist-Luenberger index. We measured agricultural carbon emissions in terms of five aspects: agricultural materials, rice planting, soil, livestock and poultry farming, and straw burning, and then compared the green total factor productivity index and the total factor productivity index. The study came to the following conclusions: (1) the green technology efficiency change was smaller than the technology efficiency change at first, but the gap between them is narrowing with time, such that the former is now larger than the latter; (2) the green technology efficiency was in a declining state and the green technology progress was increasing, promoting the green total factor productivity growth, from 1998 to 2016; and (3) China's agricultural green total factor productivity increased by 4.2% annually in the east, 3.4% annually in the central region, and 2.5% annually in the west.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems
    Angelakoglou, K.
    Gaidajis, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 : 725 - 747
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, REV DEV ECON, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9361.00130
  • [3] [Anonymous], ENV SCI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Open Access Theses & Dissertations
  • [5] Relationship between climate change and low-carbon agricultural production: A case study in Hebei Province, China
    Bai, Yuping
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Jiang, Sijian
    Zhao, Zhe
    Miao, Yi
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 105 : 438 - 447
  • [6] The complex farm-level relationship between environmental performance and productivity: The case of carbon footprint of Lombardy farms
    Baldoni, Edoardo
    Coderoni, Silvia
    Esposti, Roberto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 89 : 73 - 82
  • [7] Baldoni E, 2017, BIO-BASED APPL ECON, V6, P119, DOI 10.13128/BAE-19112
  • [8] Productivity growth in pre-1990 Mongolian agriculture: spiralling disaster or emerging success?
    Bayarsaihan, T
    Coelli, TJ
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 28 (02) : 121 - 137
  • [9] Coelli T.J., 2001, CEPA WORKING PAPERS, V4/2001, P27
  • [10] Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000
    Coelli, Tim J.
    Rao, D. S. Prasada
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 : 115 - 134