Twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart provides superior fasting plasma glucose control and a reduced rate of hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive adults with Type 2 diabetes

被引:48
|
作者
Franek, E. [1 ,2 ]
Haluzik, M. [3 ,4 ]
Varzic, S. Canecki [5 ]
Sargin, M. [6 ]
Macura, S. [7 ]
Zacho, J. [7 ]
Christiansen, J. S. [8 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Mossakowski Med Res Ctr, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Cent Clin Hosp MSW, Dept Internal Dis Endocrinol & Diabetol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Med 3, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Gen Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Clin Hosp Ctr Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[6] Kartal Training & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Novo Nordisk A S, Soborg, Denmark
[8] Aarhus Univ Hosp, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
STEADY-STATE; BASAL; IDEGASP; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12982
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs. twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who were naive to insulin. MethodsIn this 26-week, multinational, open-label, controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial, participants [mean ( sd) age 58.9 (8.9) years, duration of diabetes 9.5 (5.9) years, HbA(1c) 68 (8.7) mmol/mol or 8.4 (0.8)% and BMI 31.2 (4.2) kg/m(2)) were randomized (1:1) to insulin degludec/insulin aspart (n = 197) or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (n = 197), administered with breakfast and the main evening meal, titrated to a self-monitored plasma glucose target > 3.9 and 5.0 mmol/l. ResultsThe mean HbA(1c) was reduced to 49 mmol/mol (6.6%) with insulin degludec/insulin aspart and 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) with biphasic insulin aspart 30. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart achieved the prespecified non-inferiority margin (estimated treatment difference 0.02%; 95% CI -0.12, 0.17). Insulin degludec/insulin aspart was superior in lowering fasting plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference -1.00 mmol/l; 95% CI -1.4, -0.6; P < 0.001) and reducing overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia at a similar overall insulin dose compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30. Similar proportions of participants in each arm experienced severe hypoglycaemia. Adverse events were equally distributed. ConclusionsConsistent with previous findings, insulin degludec/insulin aspart twice daily effectively improved long-term glycaemic control, with superior reductions in FPG, and significantly less overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with Type 2 diabetes who were insulin-naive.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 505
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
    Onishi, Yukiko
    Yamada, Kenichi
    Zacho, Jeppe
    Ekelund, Jan
    Iwamoto, Yasuhiko
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2017, 8 (02) : 210 - 217
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes
    Luo, Qiong
    Zhou, Li
    Zhou, Naitong
    Hu, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [3] Effect of sulfonylureas on switching to insulin therapy (twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30): Comparison of twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 with or without glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with sub-maximal glimepiride
    Ebato, C.
    Shimizu, T.
    Arakawa, M.
    Mita, T.
    Fujitani, Y.
    Watada, H.
    Kawamori, R.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 86 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [4] Comparison of a twice daily injection of insulin aspart 50 with insulin aspart 30 in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
    Shi, Chunhong
    Sun, Luyan
    Bai, Ran
    Wang, Hao
    Liu, Dan
    Du, Jianling
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (06) : 1091 - 1096
  • [5] Similar glucose control with basal bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification
    Malek, R.
    Ajili, F.
    Assaad-Khalil, S. H.
    Shinde, A.
    Chen, J. W.
    Van den Berg, E.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2015, 41 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [6] Treat-to-target comparison between once daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine in Chinese and Japanese insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes
    Yang, Wenying
    Xu, Xiangjin
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Yang, Gangyi
    Seino, Yutaka
    Andersen, Henning
    Jinnouchi, Hideaki
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (12) : 1599 - 1608
  • [7] Efficacy of switching from basal-bolus insulin therapy to twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation plus insulin aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
    Gunes, E.
    Gunes, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (14) : 6691 - 6699
  • [8] Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in insulin-experienced Japanese subjects with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: Subgroup analysis of a Pan-Asian, treat-to-target Phase 3 Trial
    Taneda, Shinji
    Hyllested-Winge, Jacob
    Gall, Mari-Anne
    Kaneko, Shizuka
    Hirao, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2017, 9 (03) : 243 - 247
  • [9] Lower rates of hypoglycemia during maintenance treatment with insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30: a combined analysis of two Phase 3a studies in type 2 diabetes
    Christiansen, Jens Sandahl
    Niskanen, Leo
    Rasmussen, Soren
    Johansen, Thue
    Fulcher, Greg
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2016, 8 (05) : 720 - 728
  • [10] Low fasting glucose-to-estimated average glucose ratio was associated with superior response to insulin degludec/aspart compared with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Jang, Han Na
    Yang, Ye Seul
    Oh, Tae Jung
    Koo, Bo Kyung
    Lee, Seong Ok
    Park, Kyong Soo
    Jang, Hak Chul
    Jung, Hye Seung
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2022, 13 (01) : 85 - 93