The assessment of efforts to return to work in the European Union

被引:11
作者
Muijzer, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Groothoff, Johan W. [1 ,2 ]
de Boer, Wout E. L. [3 ]
Geertzen, Jan H. B. [2 ,4 ]
Brouwer, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Grad Sch Hlth Res, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[3] TNO Work & Employment, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Disability; return-to-work; vocational rehabilitation; work; DISABILITY; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS; HEURISTICS; ILLNESS; INJURY;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/ckp244
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Assessment of efforts to promote return-to-work (RTW) includes all efforts (vocational and non-vocational) designed to improve the work ability of the sick-listed employee and increase the chance to return to work. Aim of the study was to investigate whether in 13 European countries these RTW efforts are assessed and to compare the procedures by means of six criteria. Methods: Data were gathered in the taxonomy project of the European Union of Medicine in Assurance and Social Security and by means of an additional questionnaire. Results: In seven countries RTW efforts are subject of the assessment in relation to the application for disability benefits. Description of RTW efforts is a prerequisite in five countries. Guidelines on the assessment of RTW efforts are only available in the Netherlands and no countries report the use of the ICF model. Based on the results of the additional questionnaire, the assessor is a social scientist or a physician. The information used to assess RTW efforts differs, from a report on the RTW process to medical information. A negative outcome of the assessment leads to delay of the application for disability benefits or to application for rehabilitation subsidy. Conclusion: RTW efforts are assessed in half of the participating European countries. When compared, the characteristics of the assessment of RTW efforts in the participating European countries show both similarities and differences. This study may facilitate the gathering and exchange of knowledge and experience between countries on the assessment of RTW efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 694
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Transforming disability into ability: Policies to promote work and income security for disabled people
[2]  
BOER WEL, 2007, PRATIQUES ORG SOINS, V38, P205
[3]  
BOER WEL, 2004, LONG TERM DISABILITY
[4]   Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security [J].
Brage, Soren ;
Donceel, Peter ;
Falez, Freddy .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 30 (18) :1392-1396
[5]  
*EUMASS WORK GROUP, 2008, ASS LONG TERM INC WO
[6]   Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors [J].
Franche, RL ;
Krause, N .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 12 (04) :233-256
[7]  
Grammenos Stefanos., 2003, Illness, Disability and Social Inclusion
[8]  
Hadjistavropoulos T., 2001, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, V53, P52, DOI DOI 10.1037/1061-4087.53.1.52
[9]  
Hunink M.a. G., 2007, Decision making in health and medicine. Integrating evidence and values, V6th
[10]   Public health in eight European countries: an international comparison of terminology [J].
Kaiser, Sanja ;
Mackenbach, Johan P. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (02) :211-216