Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability

被引:255
作者
Costanza, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, VCs Chair Publ Policy, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Common assets; Natural capital; Valuation; Efficiency; Fairness; Sustainability; DELIBERATIVE VALUATION; VALUES; BIODIVERSITY; PREFERENCES; PSYCHOLOGY; ECONOMICS; DYNAMICS; RESOURCE; TRAGEDY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101096
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) are the ecological characteristics, functions, or processes that directly or indirectly contribute to sustainable human wellbeing. The ecosystems that provide the services are 'natural capital' (NC) using the general definition of capital as a stock that yields a flow of services over time. But these concepts must be embedded in a whole systems view of the interdependencies between humans and the rest of nature, as espoused by ecological economics from its inception. Valuing NC and ES is therefore about assessing their contributions (in complex interaction with built, human, and social capital) toward the goal of sustainable wellbeing of the whole system of humans and the rest of nature. This recognizes that sustainable human wellbeing cannot be achieved without the wellbeing of the rest of nature. To achieve this, an integrated approach to valuation toward the three sub-goals of efficient allocation (E-value), fair distribution (F-value) and sustainable scale (S-value) is necessary. This article reviews these ideas, and discusses an agenda to improve understanding and valuation of NC and ES toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability in a dynamic, whole systems context.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, THEORY JUSTICE, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
Atkins PaulWB., 2019, PROSOCIAL USING EVOL
[7]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[8]  
Barnes P, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P724, DOI 10.1126/science.319.5864.724b
[9]  
Berkes F., 1989, Common property resources: Ecology and community-based sustainable development
[10]   ECOLOGICAL ECONOMIC MODELING AND VALUATION OF ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BOCKSTAEL, N ;
COSTANZA, R ;
STRAND, I ;
BOYNTON, W ;
BELL, K ;
WAINGER, L .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) :143-159