Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test

被引:101
作者
Davies, N. B. [1 ]
Welbergen, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
brood parasitism; coevolution; cuckoo; mimicry; sparrowhawk;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2008.0331
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The similarity between many Old World parasitic cuckoos (Cuculinae) and Accipiter hawks, in size, shape and plumage, has been noted since ancient times. In particular, hawk-like underpart barring is more prevalent in parasitic than in non-parasitic cuckoos. Cuckoo-hawk resemblance may reflect convergent evolution of cryptic plumage that reduces detection by hosts and prey, or evolved mimicry of hawks by parasitic cuckoos, either for protection against hawk attacks or to facilitate brood parasitism by influencing host behaviour. Here, we provide the first evidence that some small birds respond to common cuckoos Cuculus canorus as if they were sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Great tits and blue tits were equally alarmed and reduced attendance at feeders during and after the presentation of mounted specimens of common cuckoos and sparrowhawks, but not in response to control presentations of collared doves or teal. Plumage manipulations revealed that the strong alarm response to cuckoos depended on their resemblance to hawks; cuckoos with barred underparts were treated like hawks, while those with unbarred underparts were treated like doves. However, barring was not the only feature inducing alarm because tits showed similarly strong alarm to barred and unbarred hawks, and little alarm to barred doves. These responses of tits, unsuitable as hosts and hence with no history of cuckoo parasitism, suggest that naive small birds can mistake cuckoos for hawks. Thus, any cuckoo-hawk discrimination by host species is likely to be an evolved response to brood parasitism.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1822
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   State-dependent decision making: educated predators strategically trade off the costs and benefits of consuming aposematic prey [J].
Barnett, C. A. ;
Bateson, M. ;
Rowe, C. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 18 (04) :645-651
[2]  
BROOKE MD, 1988, NATURE, V335, P630
[3]  
Chance E.P., 1940, The truth about the cuckoo
[4]   Aggressive mimics profit from a model-signal receiver mutualism [J].
Cheney, Karen L. ;
Cote, Isabelle M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 274 (1622) :2087-2091
[5]  
CRAIGHEAD JE, 1994, LUNG BIOL HEALTH DIS, V78, P79
[6]   Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and merlins F-columbarius [J].
Cresswell, W .
IBIS, 1996, 138 (04) :684-692
[7]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF CO-EVOLUTION BETWEEN THE CUCKOO, CUCULUS-CANORUS, AND ITS HOSTS .1. HOST EGG DISCRIMINATION [J].
DAVIES, NB ;
BROOKE, MD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1989, 58 (01) :207-224
[8]   Mobbing of a Drongo Cuckoo Surniculus lugubris [J].
Duckworth, JW .
IBIS, 1997, 139 (01) :190-192
[9]   RESPONSES OF BREEDING REED WARBLERS ACROCEPHALUS-SCIRPACEUS TO MOUNTS OF SPARROWHAWK ACCIPITER-NISUS, CUCKOO CUCULUS-CANORUS AND JAY GARRULUS-GLANDARIUS [J].
DUCKWORTH, JW .
IBIS, 1991, 133 (01) :68-74
[10]   Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major [J].
Gentle, LK ;
Gosler, AG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1466) :487-491