Endorectal MRI of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Prognostic Importance of Gross Locally Advanced Disease

被引:12
作者
Muglia, Valdair F. [3 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [1 ]
Wang, Zhen J. [1 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [1 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [2 ]
Coakley, Fergus V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Radiol, Ribeirao Preto Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
MR spectroscopy; MRI; prostate cancer; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; MEN; RECURRENCE; PREDICTOR; NOMOGRAM; DECISION;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.11.6425
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and incremental prognostic importance of gross locally advanced disease seen at endorectal MRI in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified the cases of all patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pretreatment endorectal MRI over a 6-year period (n = 1777). Three experienced radiologists identified by consensus patients with gross locally advanced disease, defined as unequivocal extracapsular extension or unequivocal seminal vesicle invasion. Outcome among these patients was compared with that in a control group without gross locally advanced disease matched by D'Amico risk stratification. RESULTS. Sixty-six of 1777 (3.7%) patients had gross locally advanced disease. One of 1085 (0.1%) patients had low-risk disease, 25 of 489 (5.1%) had intermediate-risk disease, and 40 of 203 (19.7%) had high-risk disease. Follow-up data were available for 44 of these 66 patients. During a median follow-up period of 79 months, biochemical failure and metastasis had developed in 17 and 6 of these 44 patients compared with 9 and none of the 65 patients in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Almost 4% of patients with prostate cancer, particularly those with intermediate- and high-risk disease, have gross locally advanced disease at endorectal MRI and have a significantly worse prognosis than matched controls. These patients may be candidates for more aggressive treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1374
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Optimal Therapy in Older Patients
    Froehner, Michael
    Wirth, Manfred P.
    DRUGS & AGING, 2013, 30 (12) : 959 - 967
  • [22] Locally advanced prostate cancer. Definition, diagnosis and treatment
    Mayor de Castro, Javier
    Cano Velasco, Jorge
    Aragon Chamizo, Juan
    Andres Boville, Guillermo
    Herranz Amo, Felipe
    Hernandez Fernandez, Carlos
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2018, 71 (03): : 231 - 238
  • [23] Treatment Strategies for High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced and Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Izumi, Kouji
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [24] Optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer
    Manfred P. Wirth
    Oliver W. Hakenberg
    Michael Froehner
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 169 - 176
  • [25] Optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer
    Wirth, Manfred P.
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Froehner, Michael
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [26] Multimodal therapy of locally advanced prostate cancer
    Heidenreich, A.
    Boehmer, D.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (03): : 333 - 344
  • [27] Role of Surgery in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Nazim, Syed Muhammad
    Abbas, Farhat
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 31 (03) : 710 - 716
  • [29] The Value of Prostate MRI with Endorectal Coil in Detecting Seminal Vesicle Involvement in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Ghafoori, Mahyar
    Alavi, Manijeh
    Shakiba, Madjid
    Hoseini, Kamal
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (01)
  • [30] Does endorectal coil MRI increase the accuracy of preoperative prostate cancer staging?
    Pooli, Aydin
    Isharwal, Sudhir
    Cook, Gates
    Oliveto, Jennifer M.
    LaGrange, Chad A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) : 8564 - 8567