Dual-task interference in simulated car driving: The psychological refractory period effect when not only the second, but also the first task is ecologically relevant

被引:0
作者
Wechsler, Konstantin [1 ]
Bock, Otmar [2 ]
Schubert, Torsten [3 ]
Koch, Iring [4 ]
机构
[1] German Sport Univ Cologne, Inst Movement Therapy & Movement Oriented Prevent, Cologne, Germany
[2] German Sport Univ Cologne, Inst Exercise Training & Sport Informat, Cologne, Germany
[3] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Psychol, Halle, Wittenberg, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Psychol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
Ecological validity; Simulated car driving; Dual-task interference; EXECUTIVE CONTROL; REACTION-TIME; PERFORMANCE; CONVERSATIONS; MULTITASKING; DISTRACTION; ATTENTION; VALIDITY; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103722
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The psychological refractory period (PRP) effect denotes the finding that shortening the temporal interval between two tasks leads to increased reaction time in the second task. Earlier work in driving simulators confirmed the emergence of a PRP effect even if the second task (T2) was ecologically relevant, such as in a car-braking task. Here we evaluate the PRP effect if the first task (T1) is ecologically relevant as well. In a driving simulator, participants had to warn pedestrians against crossing the street (T1), and had to brake when the lead car braked (T2). As the temporal interval between tasks decreased, reaction time in T2 increased, confirming once more the emergence of a PRP effect. The PRP effect in our study was larger than in previous studies where T1 was artificial rather than ecologically relevant. This suggests that an ecologically relevant T1 is processed more elaborately, resulting in stronger interference with T2.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] The psychological refractory period: Evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing
    Allen, PA
    Smith, AF
    Vires-Collins, H
    Sperry, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1998, 13 (02) : 218 - 229
  • [2] Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect
    Bock, Otmar
    Wechsler, Konstantin
    Koch, Iring
    Schubert, Torsten
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (02): : 568 - 576
  • [3] Bowrey Hannah E, 2021, OBES REV, V98, P555, DOI [10.1111/cxo.12316, DOI 10.1111/OBR.13079]
  • [4] The ecological validity of tests of executive function
    Burgess, PW
    Alderman, N
    Evans, J
    Emslie, H
    Wilson, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 4 (06) : 547 - 558
  • [5] How are distractibility and hazard prediction in driving related? Role of driving experience as moderating factor
    Castro, Candida
    Padilla, Jose-Luis
    Doncel, Pablo
    Garcia-Fernandez, Pedro
    Ventsislavova, Petya
    Eisman, Eduardo
    Crundall, David
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 81
  • [6] The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills
    Chaytor, N
    Schmitter-Edgecombe, M
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 13 (04) : 181 - 197
  • [7] Creating Pedestrian Crash Scenarios in a Driving Simulator Environment
    Chrysler, Susan T.
    Ahmad, Omar
    Schwarz, Chris W.
    [J]. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 16 : S12 - S17
  • [8] Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response
    Consiglio, W
    Driscoll, P
    Witte, M
    Berg, WP
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2003, 35 (04) : 495 - 500
  • [9] Text Messaging During Simulated Driving
    Drews, Frank A.
    Yazdani, Hina
    Godfrey, Celeste N.
    Cooper, Joel M.
    Strayer, David L.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2009, 51 (05) : 762 - 770
  • [10] Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks
    Fischer, Rico
    Plessow, Franziska
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6