Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pelvic floor bother questionnaire

被引：5

作者：

Peterson, Thais Villela ^{[1
]}

Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar ^{[2
]}

Davila, G. Willy ^{[3
]}

Nahas, Sergio Carlos ^{[2
]}

Baracat, Edmund Chada ^{[1
]}

Haddad, Jorge Milhem ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Gynecol Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Colorectal Surg Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[3] Cleveland Clin Florida, Weston, FL USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL | 2019年 / 30卷 / 01期

关键词：

Fecal incontinence; Pelvic floor disorders; Pelvic organ prolapse; Symptom assessment; Urinary incontinence; Validation studies; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS;

D O I：

10.1007/s00192-018-3627-1

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Introduction and hypothesisThe Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire (PFBQ) was designed to identify the presence and degree of bother associated with common pelvic floor symptoms. The PFBQ can be used in clinical practice and for research purposes, but it is not available in Brazilian Portuguese. We aimed to validate a cross-culturally adapted Brazilian Portuguese version of the PFBQ.MethodsA pilot-tested version of the PFBQ translated from English was evaluated with Brazilian patients suffering from pelvic floor disorders. Internal reliability, test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change were assessed.ResultsA total of 147 patients (mean age, 60.49years) were enrolled in the study. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the PFBQ demonstrated good reliability (=0.625; ICC=0.981). There was strong agreement beyond chance for each item (=0.895-1.00). The PFBQ correlated with stage of prolapse (p<0.01), number of urinary (=0.791, p<0.001) and fecal (=0.78, p<0.001) incontinence episodes, and obstructed defecation (=0.875, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe Brazilian Portuguese version of the PFBQ is a reliable, valid, and user-friendly instrument that can be used for assessing the presence and severity of pelvic floor symptoms in clinical and research settings in Brazil.

引用

页码：81 / 88

页数：8

共 21 条

[1]

[Anonymous], REV SAUDE PUBL S1

[2]

APGAR V, 1953, Curr Res Anesth Analg, V32, P260

[3] Questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders [J].

Barber, Matthew D. .

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (04) :461-465

[4] Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders [J].

Barber, MD ;

Kuchibhatla, MN ;

Pieper, CF ;

Bump, RC .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :1388-1395

[5] Validation of an Arabic version of the global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire [J].

Bazi, Tony ;

Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar ;

Ezzeddine, Dima ;

Ayoub, Hajar .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (02) :166-169

[6] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].

Bump, RC ;

Mattiasson, A ;

Bo, K ;

Brubaker, LP ;

DeLancey, JOL ;

Klarskov, P ;

Shull, BL ;

Smith, ARB .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17

[7]

Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297

[8] Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire [J].

Dogan, Hanife ;

Ozengin, Nuriye ;

Bakar, Yesim ;

Duran, Bulent .

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (10) :1577-1581

[9] Validation and cultural translation for Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) [J].

Fernandes Arouca, Mariana Alves ;

Duarte, Thaiana Bezerra ;

Malzone Lott, Daniela Alves ;

Magnani, Pedro Sergio ;

Nogueira, Antonio Alberto ;

Rosa-e-Silva, Julio Cesar ;

Oliveira Brito, Luiz Gustavo .

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (07) :1097-1106

[10]

Fleiss J., 1986, Reliability of measurement: the design and analysis of clinical experiments

← 1 2 3 →