A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients With Varicose Veins

被引:118
作者
Nordon, Ian M. [1 ]
Hinchliffe, Robert J. [1 ]
Brar, Ranjeet [1 ]
Moxey, Paul [1 ]
Black, Steve A. [1 ]
Thompson, Matt M. [1 ]
Loftus, Ian M. [1 ]
机构
[1] St George Hosp, St Georges Vasc Inst, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIAL; ENDOVENOUS ABLATION; VNUS CLOSURE; SURGERY; REFLUX; OBLITERATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the 2 endovenous solutions. This study compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Methods: Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT (810-nm diode laser). The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. Results: A total of 159 patients were randomized to RFA (79 patients) or EVLT (80 patients). Groups were well matched for demographics, disease extent, severity, and preoperative QoL. Duplex scanning confirmed 100% vein occlusion at 1 week in both groups. At 3 months, occlusion was 97% for RFA and 96% for EVLT; P = 0.67. Median (interquartile range) percentage above-knee bruise area was greater after EVLT 3.85% (6.1) than after RFA 0.6% (2); P = 0.0001. Postoperative pain assessed at each of the first 7 postoperative days was less after RFA (P = 0.001). Changes in the AVVQ (P = 0.12) and EQ-5D (P = 0.66) at 3 months were similar in both groups. Conclusions: RFA and EVLT offer comparable venous occlusion rates at 3 months after treatment of primary GSV varices; with neither modality proving superior. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising. Registration number: ISRCTN63135694 (http://www.controlled-trials.com)
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 881
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of Cyanoacrylate Closure Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins
    Alhewy, Mohammed Alsagheer
    Abdo, Ehab M.
    Ghazala, Ehab Abd elmoneim
    Khamis, Ahmed Atef
    Gado, Hassan
    Abd-Elgawad, Wael Abdo Abdo
    Abdelhafez, Abdelaziz Ahmed
    El Sayed, Abdullah
    Khedr, Alhussein M.
    Mosaed, Haytham Ameer Mahmoud
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 98 : 309 - 316
  • [32] Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein, comparing one versus two treatment cycles for the proximal vein segment
    Sufian, S.
    Arnez, A.
    Labropoulos, N.
    Nguyen, K.
    Satwah, V.
    Marquez, J.
    Chowla, A.
    Lakhanpal, S.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2015, 30 (10) : 724 - 728
  • [33] A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins
    Davies, Huw O. B.
    Popplewell, Matthew
    Darvall, Katy
    Bate, Gareth
    Bradbury, Andrew W.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2016, 31 (04) : 234 - 240
  • [34] Endovenous Lasering Versus Ambulatory Phlebectomy of Varicose Tributaries in Conjunction with Endovenous Laser Treatment of the Great or Small Saphenous Vein
    Kim, Hyun Koo
    Kim, Hark Jei
    Shim, Jae Hoon
    Baek, Man-Jong
    Sohn, Young-sang
    Choi, Young Ho
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 23 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [35] Efficacy of laser acupuncture for carpal tunnel syndrome A study protocol for a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Chuan-Chih
    Wu, Yung-Tsan
    Su, Yu-Chi
    Shen, Yu-Ping
    Chen, Fang-Pey
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (30)
  • [36] Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
    Carradice, D.
    Mekako, A. I.
    Mazari, F. A. K.
    Samuel, N.
    Hatfield, J.
    Chetter, I. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (08) : 1117 - 1123
  • [37] Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing High Ligation Combined With Endovenous Laser Ablation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein
    Kalteis, Manfred
    Adelsgruber, Peter
    Messie-Werndl, Susanne
    Gangl, Odo
    Berger, Irmgard
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2015, 41 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [38] Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing mechanochemical and thermal ablation in the treatment of insufficient great saphenous veins
    Vahaaho, Sari
    Halmesmaki, Karolina
    Mahmoud, Osman
    Alback, Anders
    Noronen, Katarina
    Venermo, Maarit
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2021, 9 (03) : 652 - 659
  • [39] A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing radiofrequency and mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins - Final results of the Venefit versus Clarivein for varicose veins trial
    Lane, Tristan
    Bootun, Roshan
    Dharmarajah, Brahman
    Lim, Chung S.
    Najem, Mojahid
    Renton, Sophie
    Sritharan, Kaji
    Davies, Alun H.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2017, 32 (02) : 89 - 98
  • [40] Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Doeke Boersma
    Ramon RJP van Eekeren
    Hans JC Kelder
    Debora AB Werson
    Suzanne Holewijn
    Michiel A Schreve
    Michel MPJ Reijnen
    Jean Paul PM de Vries
    Trials, 15