A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients With Varicose Veins

被引:118
作者
Nordon, Ian M. [1 ]
Hinchliffe, Robert J. [1 ]
Brar, Ranjeet [1 ]
Moxey, Paul [1 ]
Black, Steve A. [1 ]
Thompson, Matt M. [1 ]
Loftus, Ian M. [1 ]
机构
[1] St George Hosp, St Georges Vasc Inst, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIAL; ENDOVENOUS ABLATION; VNUS CLOSURE; SURGERY; REFLUX; OBLITERATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endovenous ablation of varicose veins using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) has reported advantages over traditional open surgical treatment. There is little evidence comparing the efficacy and patient-reported outcomes between the 2 endovenous solutions. This study compares the RFA and EVLT strategies in a prospective double-blind clinical trial. Methods: Consecutive patients with primary unilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux undergoing endovenous treatment were randomized to RFA (VNUS ClosureFAST) or EVLT (810-nm diode laser). The primary outcome measure was GSV occlusion at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcome measures were occlusion at 7 days, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising, assessed at day 7 after surgery. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D. Results: A total of 159 patients were randomized to RFA (79 patients) or EVLT (80 patients). Groups were well matched for demographics, disease extent, severity, and preoperative QoL. Duplex scanning confirmed 100% vein occlusion at 1 week in both groups. At 3 months, occlusion was 97% for RFA and 96% for EVLT; P = 0.67. Median (interquartile range) percentage above-knee bruise area was greater after EVLT 3.85% (6.1) than after RFA 0.6% (2); P = 0.0001. Postoperative pain assessed at each of the first 7 postoperative days was less after RFA (P = 0.001). Changes in the AVVQ (P = 0.12) and EQ-5D (P = 0.66) at 3 months were similar in both groups. Conclusions: RFA and EVLT offer comparable venous occlusion rates at 3 months after treatment of primary GSV varices; with neither modality proving superior. RFA is associated with less periprocedural pain, analgesic requirement, and bruising. Registration number: ISRCTN63135694 (http://www.controlled-trials.com)
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 881
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 12-W Versus 14-W Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins: 5-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Samuel, Nehemiah
    Wallace, Tom
    Carradice, Daniel
    Mazari, Fayyaz A. K.
    Chetter, Ian C.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 47 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [22] A randomized trial of cryo stripping versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein
    Klem, Taco M. A. L.
    Schnater, J. Marco
    Schutte, P. Ronald
    Hop, Wim
    van der Ham, Arie C.
    Wittens, Cornelis H. A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (02) : 403 - 409
  • [23] Anterior accessory saphenous vein confluence anatomy at the sapheno-femoral junction as risk factor for varicose veins recurrence after great saphenous vein radiofrequency thermal ablation
    Baccellieri, Domenico
    Ardita, Vincenzo
    Carta, Niccolo
    Melissano, Germano
    Chiesa, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2020, 39 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [24] Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Flessenkaemper, I.
    Hartmann, M.
    Stenger, D.
    Roll, S.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [25] Compression versus No Compression after Endovenous Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ayo, Diego
    Blumberg, Sheila N.
    Rockman, Caron R.
    Sadek, Mikel
    Cayne, Neal
    Adelman, Mark
    Kabnick, Lowell
    Maldonado, Thomas
    Berland, Todd
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 38 : 72 - 77
  • [26] Randomized clinical trial comparing surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins
    Venermo, M.
    Saarinen, J.
    Eskelinen, E.
    Vahaaho, S.
    Saarinen, E.
    Railo, M.
    Uurto, I.
    Salenius, J.
    Alback, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (11) : 1438 - 1444
  • [27] Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
    Mohamed, Abduraheem H.
    Howitt, Annabel
    Rae, Shivani
    Cai, Paris L.
    Hitchman, Louise
    Wallace, Tom
    Nandhra, Sandip
    Pymer, Sean
    Knighton, Alexander
    Smith, George
    Chetter, Ian C.
    Carradice, Daniel
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111 (08)
  • [28] Effect of laser acupuncture on adhesive small bowel obstruction A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Shih, Chun-Han
    Hsieh, Ting-Min
    Wu, Bei-Yu
    Liu, Chun-Ting
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (09) : E25035
  • [29] Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins
    Disselhoff, B. C. V. M.
    Kinderen, D. J. der
    Kelder, J. C.
    Moll, F. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (08) : 1107 - 1111
  • [30] Treatment of depression with onabotulinumtoxinA: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
    Finzi, Eric
    Rosenthal, Norman E.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2014, 52 : 1 - 6