Prenatal care utilization in pregnant women who consider but do not have abortions

被引:3
|
作者
Toscano, Marika [1 ]
Wood, Jillian [2 ]
Spielman, Sara [1 ]
Ferri, Rita [3 ]
Whaley, Natalie [1 ]
Seligman, Neil S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 601 Elmwood Ave,Box 668, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Med Ctr, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
Prenatal care utilization; Termination of pregnancy; Pregnancy ambivalence; Postpartum contraception; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; HEALTH; CONSEQUENCES; BARRIERS; RECEIVE; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04343-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Over half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended, and 18% result in termination of pregnancy (TOP). Some women seek TOP, but ultimately continue their pregnancy. Data are limited about their utilization of prenatal care and their perinatal outcomes. Our primary outcome was to investigate differences in guideline-based prenatal care utilization in women who consider but do not have an abortion. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients having obstetrical dating ultrasound (US) from 2011-2018 at a single academic medical center that offers TOP. Contemplators completed US with intention of TOP but instead continued the pregnancy to live birth. A 2:1 group of non-contemplators completed US and continued to live birth. A prenatal care utilization scoring system was used to compare groups. Secondary outcomes investigated differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and postpartum care. Results There were 94 contemplators and 183 non-contemplators. Inadequate prenatal care utilization initially was more common in contemplators than non-contemplators (62.8% vs 85.8%, p < 0.01) but was not significant after adjustment (aOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.40 - 2.56). There were no differences in adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes. Contemplators were significantly more likely to have a postpartum contraceptive method (PPCM) upon hospital discharge (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 1.16 - 20.0) and significantly more likely to use a highly-effective PPCM (aOR 6.4, 95% CI 2.34 - 17.4). Conclusions Reversal of intention for TOP is not associated with differences in prenatal care utilization, but is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraceptive method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prenatal care utilization in pregnant women who consider but do not have abortions
    Marika Toscano
    Jillian Wood
    Sara Spielman
    Rita Ferri
    Natalie Whaley
    Neil S. Seligman
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [2] Does Group Prenatal Care Affect Satisfaction And Prenatal Care Utilization in Iranian Pregnant Women?
    Jafari, F.
    Eftekhar, H.
    Mohammad, K.
    Fotouhi, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 39 (02) : 52 - 62
  • [3] Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women
    Johnson, Allan A.
    Hatcher, Barbara J.
    El-Khorazaty, M. Nabil
    Milligan, Renee. A.
    Bhaskar, Brinda
    Rodan, Margaret E.
    Richards, Leslie
    Wingrove, Barbara K.
    Laryea, Haziel A.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2007, 18 (03) : 620 - 636
  • [4] Progression of care among women who use a midwife for prenatal care: Who remains in midwife care?
    Weisband, Yiska Loewenberg
    Gallo, Maria F.
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    Shoben, Abigail B.
    Norris, Alison H.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2018, 45 (01): : 28 - 36
  • [5] Predictors of prenatal care satisfaction among pregnant women in American Samoa
    Adeyinka, Oluwaseyi
    Jukic, Anne Marie
    McGarvey, Stephen T.
    Muasau-Howard, Bethel T.
    Faiai, Mata'uitafa
    Hawley, Nicola L.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [6] PRENATAL-CARE AND DRUG-USE IN PREGNANT-WOMEN
    FUNKHOUSER, AW
    BUTZ, AM
    FENG, TI
    MCCAUL, ME
    ROSENSTEIN, BJ
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1993, 33 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [7] Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision
    Tuncalp, O.
    Were, W. M.
    MacLennan, C.
    Oladapo, O. T.
    Guelmezoglu, A. M.
    Bahl, R.
    Daelmans, B.
    Mathai, M.
    Say, L.
    Kristensen, F.
    Temmerman, M.
    Bustreo, F.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (08) : 1045 - 1049
  • [8] Interventions for improving outcomes for pregnant women who have experienced genital cutting
    Balogun, Olukunmi O.
    Hirayama, Fumi
    Wariki, Windy M. V.
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Mori, Rintaro
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02):
  • [9] Association between Migrant Women's Legal Status and Prenatal Care Utilization in the PreCARE Cohort
    Eslier, Maxime
    Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine
    Sauvegrain, Priscille
    Schmitz, Thomas
    Luton, Dominique
    Mandelbrot, Laurent
    Estellat, Candice
    Azria, Elie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 17
  • [10] What do women in Medicaid say about enhanced prenatal care? Findings from the national Strong Start evaluation
    Hill, Ian
    Cross-Barnet, Caitlin
    Courtot, Brigette
    Benatar, Sarah
    Thornburgh, Sarah
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2019, 46 (02): : 244 - 252