Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences

被引:15
作者
Fujimori, Takahito [1 ,2 ]
Miwa, Toshitada [2 ]
Oda, Takenori [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Hosp, Japan Community Healthcare Org, Dept Orthoped Surg, 4-2-78 Fukushimaku, Fukushima, Osaka 5530003, Japan
[2] Sumitomo Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 5-3-20 Kitaku Nakanoshima, Osaka, Osaka 5300005, Japan
[3] Osaka Minami Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 2-1 Kidohigashimachi, Kawachi Nagano, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Clinical important difference; Cutoff; Health-related outcome; JOABPEQ; Lumbar surgery; Patient-reported; Responsiveness; Scale; Threshold; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; PATIENT; VERSIONS; OUTCOMES; JOACMEQ; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Introduced in 2007. the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) has been widely used, but its psychometric properties have not been well studied. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the JOABPEQ in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred three consecutive patients underwent lumbar surgeries between July 2013 and November 2015 in a single hospital. Of the 203 patients, 181 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Before and after surgery, the patients were asked to complete the questionnaire, including JOABPEQ, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The participants were divided into five anchoring groups, ranging from "much better" to "much worse," according to reports from both physicians and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The responsiveness of measures was compared among five domains of the JOABPEQ ("low back pain," "walking ability," "lumbar function," "social function," and "mental health"). two domains of the SF-8 (the physical component summary [PCS] and the mental component summary [MCS]), and the EQ-5D. The responsiveness was assessed by the paired t test, the effect size, and the standardized response mean. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were assessed using the five anchoring groups as external criteria. The clinically important differences, based on the ROC curve, were assessed. RESULTS: Walking ability was most responsive, followed by low back pain and the PCS. The MCS was least responsive, followed by mental health and lumbar function. Social function and the EQ-5D had intermediate-level responsiveness. The substantial clinically important differences occurred at 20 points for low back pain and lumbar function, 23 points for walking ability, 14 points for social function, and 8 points for mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The JOABPEQ domains are responsive measures in patients who undergo lumbar surgery. For physical function, the threshold for substantial clinically important differences was approximately 20 points for the JOABPEQ. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 103
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?
    Alfayez, Saud Mohammed
    Bin Dous, Abdullah Nasser
    Altowim, Abdullah Abdulaziz
    Alrabiei, Qais Abdulmohsin
    Alsubaie, Bandar Obaid
    Awwad, Waleed Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (04) : 618 - 621
  • [2] An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a validation study of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score
    Azimi, Parisa
    Mohammadi, Hasan Reza
    Montazeri, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2012, 17 (04) : 341 - 345
  • [3] Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for Elderly Patients with a Femoral Neck Fracture
    Burgers, Paul T. P. W.
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    Van Bakel, Theodorus M. J.
    Tuinebreijer, Wim E.
    Zielinski, Stephanie M.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Patka, Peter
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (09) : 751 - 757
  • [4] Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Campbell, Mitchell J.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [5] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Chen, Poyu
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Liing, Rong-Jiuan
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chang, Ku-Chou
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 1585 - 1596
  • [6] Responsiveness of the Chinese Versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index in Postoperative Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Chien, Andy
    Lai, Dar-Ming
    Cheng, Chih-Hsiu
    Wang, Shwu-Fen
    Hsu, Wei-Li
    Wang, Jaw-Lin
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (17) : 1315 - 1321
  • [7] Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales
    Copay, Anne G.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Berven, Sigurd
    Schuler, Thomas C.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) : 968 - 974
  • [8] The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review
    Coretti, Silvia
    Ruggeri, Matteo
    McNamee, Paul
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (02) : 221 - 233
  • [9] Evaluating the Correlation and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Pain With Function and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Spine Surgery
    DeVine, John
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Ecker, Erika
    Fourney, Daryl R.
    Vaccaro, Alex
    Wang, Jeff
    Andersson, Gunnar
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) : S69 - S74
  • [10] Validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system based on patient-reported improvement after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Okuda, Shinya
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    Yamasaki, Ryoji
    Maeno, Takafumi
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Matsumoto, Tomiya
    Wada, Eiji
    Oda, Takenori
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (06) : 728 - 736