Shifting care from hospital to community, a strategy to integrate care in Singapore: process evaluation of implementation fidelity

被引:23
作者
Nurjono, Milawaty [1 ,2 ]
Shrestha, Pami [3 ]
Ang, Ian Yi Han [3 ]
Shiraz, Farah [2 ,3 ]
Eh, Ke Xin [2 ]
Toh, Sue-Anne Ee Shiow [3 ]
Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Maria [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Hlth Serv Res, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Reg Hlth Syst Off, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Patient & Care, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Panaxea BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Integrated care; Shift from hospital to community; Multi-morbidity; PCMH; Process evaluation; Implementation fidelity; Realist evaluation; COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; HEALTH OUTCOMES; COLLABORATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05263-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Accessibility to efficient and person-centered healthcare delivery drives healthcare transformation in many countries. In Singapore, specialist outpatient clinics (SOCs) are commonly congested due to increasing demands for chronic care. To improve this situation, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS) started an integrated care initiative,the Right-Site Care (RSC) program in 2014. Through collaborations between SOCs at the National University Hospital and primary and community care (PCC) clinics in the western region of the county, the program was designed to facilitate timely discharge and appropriate transition of patients, who no longer required specialist care, to the community. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the NUHS RHS RSC program using the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF), at three distinct levels; providers, organizational, and system levels to explain outcomes of the program and to inform further development of (similar) programs. Methods A convergent parallel mixed methods study using the realist evaluation approach was used. Data were collected between 2016 and 2018 through non-participatory observations, reviews of medical records and program database, together with semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Triangulation of data streams was applied guided by the modified CFIF. Results Our findings showed four out of six program components were implemented with low level of fidelity, and 9112 suitable patients were referred to the program while 3032 (33.3%) declined to be enrolled. Moderating factors found to influence fidelity included: (i) complexity of program, (ii) evolving providers' responsiveness, (iii) facilitation through synergistic partnership, training of PCC providers by specialists and supportive structures: care coordinators, guiding protocols, shared electronic medical record and shared pharmacy, (iv) lack of organization reinforcement, and (v) mismatch between program goals, healthcare financing and providers' reimbursement. Conclusion Functional integration alone is insufficient for a successful right-site care program implementation. Improvement in relationships between providers, organizations, and patients are also warranted for further development of the program.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Right-Site Care Programme with a community-based family medicine clinic in Singapore: secondary data analysis of its impact on mortality and healthcare utilisation [J].
Ang, Ian Yi Han ;
Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian ;
Rahman, Nabilah ;
Nurjono, Milawaty ;
Tham, Tat Yean ;
Toh, Sue-Anne ;
Wee, Hwee Lin .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CONTINUITY COORDINAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Technical Brief, V1, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WHO global strategy on integrated people-centred health services 2016-2026
[5]  
[Anonymous], HEALTHCARE 2020 IMPR
[6]   Shifting chronic disease management from hospitals to primary care in Estonian health system: analysis of national panel data [J].
Atun, Rifat ;
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek ;
Hone, Thomas ;
Pell, Lisa ;
Stokes, Jonathan ;
Habicht, Triin ;
Lukka, Kaija ;
Raaper, Elin ;
Habicht, Jarno .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2016, 6 (02)
[7]   The science of improvement [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (10) :1182-1184
[8]   Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review [J].
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Baker, G. Ross ;
Orlando, Elaina ;
Fancott, Carol ;
Bhatia, Pooja ;
Casalino, Selina ;
Onate, Kanecy ;
Denis, Jean-Louis ;
Pomey, Marie-Pascale .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
[9]   THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INTEGRATION AND COLLABORATION IN PATIENT CARE: RESULTS FROM KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS WORKING IN MULTIPROFESSIONAL HEALTH CARE TEAMS [J].
Boon, Heather S. ;
Mior, Silvano A. ;
Barnsley, Jan ;
Ashbury, Fredrick D. ;
Haig, Robert .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 32 (09) :715-722
[10]   A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research [J].
Borrelli, B ;
Sepinwall, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Bellg, AJ ;
Czajkowski, S ;
Breger, R ;
DeFrancesco, C ;
Levesque, C ;
Sharp, DL ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Resnick, B ;
Orwig, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 73 (05) :852-860