Land-cover classification using ASTER multi-band combinations based on wavelet fusion and SOM neural network

被引:9
作者
Bagan, Hasi [1 ]
Wang, Qinxue [2 ]
Watanabe, Masataka [3 ]
Karneyarna, Satoshi [4 ]
Bao, Yuhai [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, Tokyo 1538505, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Asia Water Environm Sect, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[3] Keio Univ, Fac Environm Informat, Kanagawa 2528520, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Watershed Ecosyst Sect, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[5] Inner Mongolia Normal Univ, Coll Geog Sci, Inner Mongolia 010022, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.14358/PERS.74.3.333
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In this study, we developed a land-cover classification methodology using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) visible near-infrared (VNIR) shortwave infrared (SWIR), and thermal infrared (TIR) band combinations based on wavelet fusion and the self organizing map (SOM) neural network methods, and compared the classification accuracies of different combinations of ASTER multi-band data. A wavelet fusion concept named ARSIS (Amelioration de la Resolution Spatiale par Injection de Structures) was used to fuse ASTER data in the preprocessing stage. In order to apply the wavelet fusion method to ASTER data, the principal components of ASTER VNIR data were computed. The first principal component was used as the base image for wavelet fusion. In our experiments, the spatial resolution of ASTER VNIR, SWIR, and TIR data was adjusted to the same 15 m. SOM classification accuracy was increased from 83 percent to 93 percent by this fusion, and classification accuracy increased along with the increase of band numbers. Classification accuracy reaches the highest value when all 14 bands are used, but classification accuracy closely approached the highest value when three VNIR bands, three SWIR bands, and two TIR bands were used. A similar tendency was also obtained by the maximum likelihood classification (MLC) method, but the classification accuracies of MLC over all band combinations were considerably obviously lower than those obtained by the SOM method.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 342
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Ten Lectures of Wavelets
[2]   A technique for the selection of kernel-function parameters in RBF neural networks for classification of remote-sensing images [J].
Bruzzone, L ;
Prieto, DF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (02) :1179-1184
[3]   ART neural networks for remote sensing: Vegetation classification from Landsat TM and terrain data [J].
Carpenter, GA ;
Gjaja, MN ;
Gopal, S ;
Woodcock, CE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 35 (02) :308-325
[4]  
CHAVEZ PS, 1989, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V55, P339
[5]  
Congalton R., 2019, Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices
[6]  
Third, V3rd ed.
[7]   The significance of border training patterns in classification by a feedforward neural network using back propagation learning [J].
Foody, GM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 20 (18) :3549-3562
[8]   Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy [J].
Foody, GM .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 70 (05) :627-633
[9]   Using ASTER remote sensing data set for geological mapping, in Namibia [J].
Gomez, C ;
Delacourt, C ;
Allemand, P ;
Ledru, P ;
Wackerle, R .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2005, 30 (1-3) :97-108
[10]   Self-organizing feature map neural network classification of the ASTER data based on wavelet fusion [J].
Hasi, B ;
Ma, JW ;
Li, QQ ;
Han, XZ ;
Liu, ZL .
SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES D-EARTH SCIENCES, 2004, 47 (07) :651-658