Rethinking representation

被引：778
作者：
Mansbridge, J [1 ]
机构：
[1] Harvard Univ, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源：
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW | 2003年 / 97卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1017/S0003055403000856
中图分类号：
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号：
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要：
A long with the traditional "promissory" form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here "anticipatory," "gyroscopic," and "surrogate" representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.
引用
收藏
页码：515 / 528
页数：14
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]  
Arnold DR., 1993, C RECONSIDERED
[12]   DECISIONS AND NONDECISIONS - AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK [J].
BACHRACH, P ;
BARATZ, MS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1963, 57 (03) :632-642
[13]  
Banfield E., 1961, Political influence
[14]  
Barber B., 1984, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age
[15]  
Barry B., 1991, DEMOCRACY POWER ESSA
[16]  
Behn RobertD., 2001, Rethinking Democratic Accountability
[17]  
BEITZ Charles R., 1989, Political equality: an essay in democratic theory
[18]  
Bernstein R.A., 1989, Elections, Representation, and Congressional Voting Behavior: The Myth of Constituency Control
[19]  
Bianco WilliamT., 1994, Trust: Representatives and Constituents
[20]  
BIANCO WT, 1996, RATIONALE DECRIPTIVE
12345678910