A cross-cultural study of organizational factors on safety: Japanese vs. Taiwanese oil refinery plants

被引:53
作者
Hsu, Shang Hwa [1 ]
Lee, Chun-Chia [1 ]
Wu, Muh-Cherng [1 ]
Takano, Kenichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] CRIEPI, Komae, Tokyo 2018511, Japan
关键词
safety culture; safety climate; cross-cultural; safety management; occupational safety; oil refinery industry;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.020
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This study attempts to identify idiosyncrasies of organizational factors on safety and their influence mechanisms in Taiwan and Japan. Data were collected from employees of Taiwanese and Japanese oil refinery plants. Results show that organizational factors on safety differ in the two countries. Organizational characteristics in Taiwanese plants are highlighted as: higher level of management commitment to safety, harmonious interpersonal relationship, more emphasis on safety activities, higher devotion to supervision, and higher safety self-efficacy, as we] I as high quality of safety performance. Organizational characteristics in Japanese plants are highlighted as: higher level of employee empowerment and attitude towards continuous improvement, more emphasis on systematic safety management approach, efficient reporting system and teamwork, and high quality of safety performance. The casual relationships between organizational factors and workers' safety performance were investigated using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results indicate that the influence mechanisms of organizational factors in Taiwan and Japan are different. These findings provide insights into areas of safety improvement in emerging countries and developed countries respectively. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 34
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HUMAN SAFETY RISK MA
[2]   Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety [J].
Barling, J ;
Loughlin, C ;
Kelloway, EK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :488-496
[3]  
BARLING J, 1999, 25 ANN M AC MAN TOR
[4]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[5]   ON THE FIT OF MODELS TO COVARIANCES AND METHODOLOGY TO THE BULLETIN [J].
BENTLER, PM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :400-404
[6]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[7]   Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model [J].
Brown, KA ;
Willis, PG ;
Prussia, GE .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2000, 18 (04) :445-465
[8]  
Churchill G.A., 1991, Marketing research: Methodological foundations, V5
[9]  
DANSEREAU F, 1990, ORG CLIMATE CULTURE, P399
[10]   A SAFETY CLIMATE MEASURE FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES [J].
DEDOBBELEER, N ;
BELAND, F .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1991, 22 (02) :97-103