Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) increases the risk for progression to multiple myeloma: an observational study of 2935 MGUS patients

被引:51
|
作者
Steiner, Normann [1 ]
Goebel, Georg [3 ]
Suchecki, Patricia [1 ]
Prokop, Wolfgang [4 ]
Neuwirt, Hannes [2 ]
Gunsilius, Eberhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med Haematol & Med Oncol 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med Nephrol & Hypertens 4, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Med Stat Informat & Hlth Econ, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Cent Inst Med & Chem Lab Diag, Innsbruck Med Univ Hosp, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; MGUS; monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance; MGRS; multiple myeloma; UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE; AMYLOIDOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; PREVALENCE; DEPOSITS; CHAIN;
D O I
10.18632/oncotarget.23412
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignancy preceding multiple myeloma (MM) or related disorders. In MGUS, renal impairment caused by deposition of the monoclonal immunoglobulins or free lightchains monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is often associated with high morbidity and mortality. We analysed the prevalence of renal impairment, clinical features and the long-term outcome in 2935 patients with MGUS. Methods: Between 1/2000 and 8/2016, 2935 adult patients with MGUS were identified in our database. Results: In 44/2935 (1.5%) patients MGRS was diagnosed. In MGRS patients, significantly more progressions to MM were observed than in MGUS patients (18% vs. 3%; P<0.001). MGRS patients showed a higher risk for progression (HR 3.3 [1.57.4]) in the Cox model. Median time to progression was 23 years for MGUS and 18.8 years for MGRS patients. Corresponding progression rate was 8.8 [7.2-10.7] per 1000 patient-years (py) for MGUS patients and 30.6 [15.3-61] for the MGRS group. Risk for progression within the first year after diagnosis was 1% [0.6-1.4] in the MGUS group and 10% [4-29] among MGRS patients. Conclusion: The significantly higher risk for progression to MM means MGRS patients should be monitored carefully and treated in a specialized centre.
引用
收藏
页码:2344 / 2356
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Predictive Immune Markers for Disease Progression in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
    Isgor, Irem Sahver
    Toptas, Tayfur
    Turkoz, Huseyin Kemal
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (04) : 245 - 253
  • [12] Obesity and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and progression to multiple myeloma: a population-based study
    Thordardottir, Marianna
    Lindqvist, Ebba K.
    Lund, Sigrun H.
    Costello, Rene
    Burton, Debra
    Korde, Neha
    Mailankody, Sham
    Eiriksdottir, Gudny
    Launer, Lenore J.
    Gudnason, Vilmundur
    Harris, Tamara B.
    Landgren, Ola
    Kristinsson, Sigurdur Y.
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2017, 1 (24) : 2186 - 2192
  • [13] Patients With Multiple Myeloma or Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
    Piechotta, Vanessa
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Engelhardt, Monika
    Einsele, Hermann
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Scheid, Christof
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 119 (14): : 253 - +
  • [14] Kidney Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance
    Leung, Nelson
    Heybeli, Cihan
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [15] Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance with Progression to Multiple Myeloma in a Patient with ASIA-MO Syndrome
    Vargas Gutierrez, David Alejandro
    Arias Callejas, Karina Ivonne
    Palacios Ruiz, Edwin Pavel
    Perez Vinueza, Priscila Joseline
    Munoz Vega, Juan Diego
    Mejia Geraldo, Ana Karen G.
    Zaldivar, Ingrid Salinas
    CASE REPORTS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [16] Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma
    van de Donk, N. W. C. J.
    Mutis, T.
    Poddighe, P. J.
    Lokhorst, H. M.
    Zweegman, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 38 : 110 - 122
  • [17] Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study
    Cowan, Annie
    Ferrari, Federico
    Freeman, Samuel S.
    Redd, Robert
    El-Khoury, Habib
    Perry, Jacqueline
    Patel, Vidhi
    Kaur, Priya
    Barr, Hadley
    Lee, David J.
    Lightbody, Elizabeth
    Downey, Katelyn
    Argyelan, David
    Theodorakakou, Foteini
    Fotiou, Despina
    Liacos, Christine Ivy
    Kanellias, Nikolaos
    Chavda, Selina J.
    Ainley, Louise
    Sandecka, Viera
    Pospisilova, Lenka
    Minarik, Jiri
    Jungova, Alexandra
    Radocha, Jakub
    Spicka, Ivan
    Nadeem, Omar
    Yong, Kwee
    Hajek, Roman
    Kastritis, Efstathios
    Marinac, Catherine R.
    Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
    Get, Gad
    Trippa, Lorenzo
    Ghobrial, Irene M.
    LANCET HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 10 (03): : E203 - E212
  • [18] Prothrombotic abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Nielsen, Thoger
    Kristensen, Soren Risom
    Gregersen, Henrik
    Teodorescu, Elena Manuela
    Pedersen, Shona
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 202 : 108 - 118
  • [19] Scleredema in the Setting of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance With Progression to Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
    Nickell, Austin L.
    Corn, Megan
    Mannuru, Devendranath
    Hinze, Alicia M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [20] Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Kyle, Robert A.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Foreman, Barbara J.
    Larson, Dirk R.
    Colby, Colin L.
    Phelps, Tara K.
    Dispenzieri, Angela
    Kumar, Shaji K.
    Katzmann, Jerry A.
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    BLOOD, 2009, 114 (04) : 785 - 790