The impact of treatment choice for localized prostate cancer on response to phosphodiesterase inhibitors

被引:8
|
作者
Lee, Irwin H. [1 ]
Sadetsky, Natalia [2 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [2 ]
Sandler, Howard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; impotence; phosphodiesterase inhibitors;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined whether the impact of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on sexual function and sexual bother is different after radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 1,087 men treated for localized prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, who had at least 2 years of health related quality of life followup and who reported using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor after prostate cancer treatment. Sexual function and bother were assessed over time using the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Mixed model analysis was used to examine sexual function and sexual bother over time after initiation of treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Response rates were then determined using the criterion of an increase in score of at least half the standard deviation in baseline scores, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of improved sexual function and sexual bother in response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Results: Patients treated with radical prostatectomy and those who received radiation therapy had an improvement in sexual function and sexual bother after initiating phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Response rates were similar for both types of treatment, and the only significant predictors of response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were higher baseline (pretreatment) sexual function score and lower sexual function before phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. There was no significant change in response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors over time. Conclusions: Analysis of these data suggests that choice of treatment for localized prostate cancer is unlikely to have a significant impact on response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors should they be needed after treatment. However, patients with better pretreatment sexual function are more likely to respond to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1076
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer multifocality: impact on cancer biology and treatment recommendations
    Delacroix, S. E.
    Ward, J. F.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2010, 52 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [42] Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use and Disease Recurrence After Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Loeb, Stacy
    Folkvaljon, Yasin
    Robinson, David
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Garmo, Hans
    Stattin, Par
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (05) : 824 - 828
  • [43] Asian race and impact on outcomes after radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Man, A
    Pickles, T
    Chi, KN
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (03) : 901 - 904
  • [44] Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: Differences based on treatment modality
    Davis, JW
    Kuban, DA
    Lynch, DF
    Schellhammer, PF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) : 947 - 952
  • [45] Impact of surgical delay on long-term cancer control for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Khan, MA
    Mangold, LA
    Epstein, JI
    Boitnott, JK
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) : 1835 - 1839
  • [46] Surveillance and Deferred Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer. Population Based Study in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden
    Stattin, Par
    Holmberg, Erik
    Bratt, Ola
    Adolfsson, Jan
    Johansson, Jan-Erik
    Hugosson, Jonas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06) : 2423 - 2429
  • [47] Communicative aspects of decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment - A systematic review
    Vromans, Ruben D.
    van Eenbergen, Mies C.
    Pauws, Steffen C.
    Geleijnse, Gijs
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
    Krahmer, Emiel J.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (07) : 409 - 429
  • [48] Radical perineal prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in morbidly obese patients
    Dahm, P
    Yang, BK
    Salmen, CR
    Moul, JW
    Gan, TJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) : 131 - 134
  • [49] High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Alkhorayef, Mohammed
    Mahmoud, Mustafa Z.
    Alzimami, Khalid S.
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
    Fagiri, Maram A.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 80 : 131 - 141
  • [50] Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Ragde, H
    Korb, L
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (01): : 45 - 51