The impact of treatment choice for localized prostate cancer on response to phosphodiesterase inhibitors

被引:8
|
作者
Lee, Irwin H. [1 ]
Sadetsky, Natalia [2 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [2 ]
Sandler, Howard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; impotence; phosphodiesterase inhibitors;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined whether the impact of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on sexual function and sexual bother is different after radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 1,087 men treated for localized prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, who had at least 2 years of health related quality of life followup and who reported using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor after prostate cancer treatment. Sexual function and bother were assessed over time using the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Mixed model analysis was used to examine sexual function and sexual bother over time after initiation of treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Response rates were then determined using the criterion of an increase in score of at least half the standard deviation in baseline scores, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of improved sexual function and sexual bother in response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Results: Patients treated with radical prostatectomy and those who received radiation therapy had an improvement in sexual function and sexual bother after initiating phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Response rates were similar for both types of treatment, and the only significant predictors of response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were higher baseline (pretreatment) sexual function score and lower sexual function before phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. There was no significant change in response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors over time. Conclusions: Analysis of these data suggests that choice of treatment for localized prostate cancer is unlikely to have a significant impact on response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors should they be needed after treatment. However, patients with better pretreatment sexual function are more likely to respond to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1076
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survival in blacks and whites after treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Fowler, JE
    Terrell, F
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (01) : 133 - 136
  • [22] Correlates of Bother Following Treatment for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Gore, John L.
    Gollapudi, Kiran
    Bergman, Jonathan
    Kwan, Lorna
    Krupski, Tracey L.
    Litwin, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04) : 1309 - 1314
  • [23] Racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of localized/regional prostate cancer
    Underwood, W
    DeMonner, S
    Ubel, P
    Fagerlin, A
    Sanda, MG
    Wei, JT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) : 1504 - 1507
  • [24] The use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors for the treatment of alopecia
    Juhasz, Margit L. W.
    Atanaskova Mesinkovska, Natasha
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2020, 31 (03) : 245 - 253
  • [25] The Association between Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Prostate Cancer: Results from the REDUCE Study
    Jamnagerwalla, Juzar
    Howard, Lauren E.
    Vidal, Adriana C.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Castro-Santamaria, Ramiro
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (03) : 715 - 720
  • [26] Association between Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer and Mental Health Outcomes
    Luckenbaugh, Amy N.
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Huang, Li-Ching
    Wittmann, Daniela
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Zhao, Zighuo
    Koyama, Tatsuki
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Conwill, Ralph
    Goodman, Michael
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Wu, Xiao-Cheng
    Paddock, Lisa E.
    Stroup, Antoinette
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Hashibe, Mia
    O'Neil, Brock B.
    Kaplan, Sherrie H.
    Greenfield, Sheldon
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Penson, David F.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05) : 1029 - 1037
  • [27] Race as an independent predictor of outcome after treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Sohayda, CJ
    Kupelian, PA
    Altsman, KA
    Klein, EA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04) : 1331 - 1336
  • [28] High dose rate brachytherapy as a boost for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Phan, Thinh P.
    Syed, A. M. Nisar
    Puthawala, Ajmel
    Sharma, Anil
    Khan, Farhan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) : 123 - 127
  • [29] The Impact of Medicare Low-income Subsidy on Access to Treatment, Treatment Choice, and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Joyce, Daniel D.
    Qin, Xuanzi
    Sharma, Vidit
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Dusetzina, Stacie B.
    Moses, Kelvin A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [30] Trends in treatment costs for localized prostate cancer - The healthy screenee effect
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Penson, David F.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (02) : 154 - 159