Estimating the reliability of glycemic index values and potential sources of methodological and biological variability

被引:84
作者
Matthan, Nirupa R. [1 ]
Ausman, Lynne M. [1 ]
Meng, Huicui [1 ]
Tighiouart, Hocine [2 ]
Lichtenstein, Alice H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutr Res Ctr Aging, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
关键词
glycemic index; variability; healthy volunteers; insulin index; glycated hemoglobin; RISK-FACTORS; LOAD; FOODS; CARBOHYDRATE; RESPONSES; DISEASE; METAANALYSIS; SIMILARITY; NUTRITION; TABLES;
D O I
10.3945/ajcn.116.137208
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The utility of glycemic index (GI) values for chronic disease risk management remains controversial. Although absolute GI value determinations for individual foods have been shown to vary significantly in individuals with diabetes, there is a dearth of data on the reliability of GI value determinations and potential sources of variability among healthy adults. Objective: We examined the intra- and inter-individual variability in glycemic response to a single food challenge and methodologic and biological factors that potentially mediate this response. Design: The GI value for white bread was determined by using standardized methodology in 63 volunteers free from chronic disease and recruited to differ by sex, age (18-85 y), and body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2)): 20-35]. Volunteers randomly underwent 3 sets of food challenges involving glucose (reference) and white bread (test food), both providing 50 g available carbohydrates. Serum glucose and insulin were monitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curve (AUC) methods. Biochemical variables were measured by using standard assays and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The mean +/- SD GI value for white bread was 62 +/- 15 when calculated by using the recommended method. Mean intra- and interindividual CVs were 20% and 25%, respectively. Increasing sample size, replication of reference and test foods, and length of blood sampling, as well as AUC calculation method, did not improve the CVs. Among the biological factors assessed, insulin index and glycated hemoglobin values explained 15% and 16% of the variability in mean GI value for white bread, respectively. Conclusions: These data indicate that there is substantial variability in individual responses to GI value determinations, demonstrating that it is unlikely to be a good approach to guiding food choices. Additionally, even in healthy individuals, glycemic status significantly contributes to the variability in GI value estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1013
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre [J].
Agostoni, Carlo ;
Bresson, Jean-Louis ;
Fairweather-Tait, Susan ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Golly, Ines ;
Korhonen, Hannu ;
Lagiou, Pagona ;
Lovik, Martinus ;
Marchelli, Rosangela ;
Martin, Ambroise ;
Moseley, Bevan ;
Neuhaeuser-Berthold, Monika ;
Przyrembel, Hildegard ;
Salminen, Seppo ;
Sanz, Yolanda ;
Strain, Sean ;
Strobel, Stephan ;
Tetens, Inge ;
Tome, Daniel ;
van Loveren, Hendrik ;
Verhagen, Hans .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (03)
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIET GUID AM 2015 20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ISO 26642-2010
[4]   International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008 [J].
Atkinson, Fiona S. ;
Foster-Powell, Kaye ;
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. .
DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (12) :2281-2283
[5]   Health Canada's evaluation of the use of glycemic index claims on food labels [J].
Aziz, Alfred ;
Dumais, Lydia ;
Barber, Jennifer .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 98 (02) :269-274
[6]   A systematic review of the influence of rice characteristics and processing methods on postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses [J].
Boers, Hanny M. ;
ten Hoorn, Jack Seijen ;
Mela, David J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015, 114 (07) :1035-1045
[7]   Glycaemic index methodology [J].
Brouns, F ;
Bjorck, I ;
Frayn, KN ;
Gibbs, AL ;
Lang, V ;
Slama, G ;
Wolever, TMS .
NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2005, 18 (01) :145-171
[8]   Controlling subjects' prior diet and activities does not reduce within-subject variation of postprandial glycemic responses to foods [J].
Campbell, JE ;
Glowczewski, T ;
Wolever, TMS .
NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2003, 23 (05) :621-629
[9]   Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis [J].
Choi, Yuni ;
Giovannucci, Edward ;
Lee, Jung Eun .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2012, 108 (11) :1934-1947
[10]   Meta-Analysis of Dietary Glycemic Load and Glycemic Index in Relation to Risk of Coronary Heart Disease [J].
Dong, Jia-Yi ;
Zhang, Yong-Hong ;
Wang, Peiyu ;
Qin, Li-Qiang .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 109 (11) :1608-1613