Automated Annotator Variability Inspection for Biomedical Image Segmentation

被引:10
作者
Schilling, Marcel P. [1 ]
Scherr, Tim [1 ]
Muenke, Friedrich R. [1 ]
Neumann, Oliver [1 ]
Schutera, Mark [1 ]
Mikut, Ralf [1 ]
Reischl, Markus [1 ]
Schilling, Marcel [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Automat & Appl Informat, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany
关键词
Annotations; Image segmentation; Task analysis; Noise measurement; Uncertainty; Inspection; Training; Artificial neural networks; automation; machine learning; segmentation; image processing;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3140378
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Supervised deep learning approaches for automated diagnosis support require datasets annotated by experts. Intra-annotator variability of a single annotator and inter-annotator variability between annotators can affect the quality of the diagnosis support. As medical experts will always differ in annotation details, quantitative studies concerning the annotation quality are of particular interest. A consistent and noise-free annotation of large-scale datasets by, for example, dermatologists or pathologists is a current challenge. Hence, methods are needed to automatically inspect annotations in datasets. In this paper, we categorize annotation noise in image segmentation tasks, present methods to simulate annotation noise, and examine the impact on the segmentation quality. Two novel automated methods to identify intra-annotator and inter-annotator inconsistencies based on uncertainty-aware deep neural networks are proposed. We demonstrate the benefits of our automated inspection methods such as focused re-inspection of noisy annotations or the detection of generally different annotation styles using the biomedical ISIC 2017 Melanoma image segmentation dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:2753 / 2765
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges [J].
Abdar, Moloud ;
Pourpanah, Farhad ;
Hussain, Sadiq ;
Rezazadegan, Dana ;
Liu, Li ;
Ghavamzadeh, Mohammad ;
Fieguth, Paul ;
Cao, Xiaochun ;
Khosravi, Abbas ;
Acharya, U. Rajendra ;
Makarenkov, Vladimir ;
Nahavandi, Saeid .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 76 :243-297
[2]  
Aggarwal K., 2022, Iraqi Journal For Computer Science and Mathematics, V3, DOI [DOI 10.52866/IJCSM.2022, 10.52866/ijcsm.2022.01, DOI 10.52866/IJCSM.2022.01]
[3]  
Bartschat A, 2019, IMAGE LABELING TOOL
[4]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[5]  
Biewald L., 2020, EXPT TRACKING WEIGHT
[6]  
Bohland M., 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0257635
[7]  
Bradski G, 2000, DR DOBBS J, V25, P120
[8]   Albumentations: Fast and Flexible Image Augmentations [J].
Buslaev, Alexander ;
Iglovikov, Vladimir I. ;
Khvedchenya, Eugene ;
Parinov, Alex ;
Druzhinin, Mikhail ;
Kalinin, Alexandr A. .
INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (02)
[9]   Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 Data Science Bowl [J].
Caicedo, Juan C. ;
Goodman, Allen ;
Karhohs, Kyle W. ;
Cimini, Beth A. ;
Ackerman, Jeanelle ;
Haghighi, Marzieh ;
Heng, CherKeng ;
Becker, Tim ;
Minh Doan ;
McQuin, Claire ;
Rohban, Mohammad ;
Singh, Shantanu ;
Carpenter, Anne E. .
NATURE METHODS, 2019, 16 (12) :1247-+
[10]   Deep learning-based medical image segmentation with limited labels [J].
Chi, Weicheng ;
Ma, Lin ;
Wu, Junjie ;
Chen, Mingli ;
Lu, Weiguo ;
Gu, Xuejun .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (23)