Evaluation of GOCE-based global gravity field models over Japan after the full mission using free-air gravity anomalies and geoid undulations

被引:9
作者
Odera, Patroba Achola [1 ]
Fukuda, Yoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Architecture Planning & Geomat, Div Geomat, Private Bag X3, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Sakyo Ku, Kitashirakawa Oiwake Cho, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2017年 / 69卷
关键词
Geoid model; Gravity; GPS/levelling; GOCE; EGM2008;
D O I
10.1186/s40623-017-0716-1
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The performance of Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) global gravity field models (GGMs), at the end of GOCE mission covering 42 months, is evaluated using geoid undulations and free-air gravity anomalies over Japan, including six sub-regions (Hokkaido, north Honshu, central Honshu, west Honshu, Shikoku and Kyushu). Seventeen GOCE-based GGMs are evaluated and compared with EGM2008. The evaluations are carried out at 150, 180, 210, 240 and 270 spherical harmonics degrees. Results show that EGM2008 performs better than GOCE and related GGMs in Japan and three sub-regions (Hokkaido, central Honshu and Kyushu). However, GOCE and related GGMs perform better than EGM2008 in north Honshu, west Honshu and Shikoku up to degree 240. This means that GOCE data can improve geoid model over half of Japan. The improvement is only evident between degrees 150 and 240 beyond which EGM2008 performs better than GOCE GGMs in all the six regions. In general, the latest GOCE GGMs (releases 4 and 5) perform better than the earlier GOCE GGMs (releases 1, 2 and 3), indicating the contribution of data collected by GOCE in the last months before the mission ended on 11 November 2013. The results indicate that a more accurate geoid model over Japan is achievable, based on a combination of GOCE, EGM2008 and terrestrial gravity data sets.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abd-Elmotaal HA, 2015, NEWTONS B, V5, P149
  • [2] [Anonymous], 4 INT GOCE US WORKSH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, 2011 GEN ASS EUR GEO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 5 INT GOCE US WORKSH
  • [5] EGM_TIM_RL05: An independent geoid with centimeter accuracy purely based on the GOCE mission
    Brockmann, Jan Martin
    Zehentner, Norbert
    Hoeck, Eduard
    Pail, Roland
    Loth, Ina
    Mayer-Guerr, Torsten
    Schuh, Wolf-Dieter
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (22) : 8089 - 8099
  • [6] The new ESA satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach
    Bruinsma, Sean L.
    Foerste, Christoph
    Abrikosov, Oleg
    Marty, Jean-Charles
    Rio, Marie-Helene
    Mulet, Sandrine
    Bonvalot, Sylvain
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (14) : 3607 - 3612
  • [7] Bruinsma SL, 2010, ESA LIV PLAN S JUN 2
  • [8] Cheng M, 2015, ASSESSMENT GOCE GEOP, V5, P187
  • [9] Godah W., 2015, NEWTONS B, V5, P49
  • [10] Validation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons
    Gruber, Th.
    Visser, P. N. A. M.
    Ackermann, Ch.
    Hosse, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2011, 85 (11) : 845 - 860