Application of a semi-automatic cartilage segmentation method for biomechanical modeling of the knee joint

被引:27
|
作者
Liukkonen, Mimmi K. [1 ,2 ]
Mononen, Mika E. [1 ]
Tanska, Petri [1 ]
Saarakkala, Simo [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nieminen, Miika T. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Korhonen, Rami K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Appl Phys, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Diagnost Imaging Ctr, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Med Imaging Phys & Technol, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Oulu, Med Res Ctr Oulu, Oulu, Finland
[5] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Oulu, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Cartilage; finite element analysis; image segmentation; knee; magnetic resonance imaging; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGES; 3D FINITE-ELEMENT; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; CONTACT AREA; MENISCUS; STRESSES; COLLAGEN; OSTEOARTHRITIS; MENISCECTOMY; MECHANICS;
D O I
10.1080/10255842.2017.1375477
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Manual segmentation of articular cartilage from knee joint 3D magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a time consuming and laborious task. Thus, automatic methods are needed for faster and reproducible segmentations. In the present study, we developed a semi-automatic segmentation method based on radial intensity profiles to generate 3D geometries of knee joint cartilage which were then used in computational biomechanical models of the knee joint. Six healthy volunteers were imaged with a 3T MRI device and their knee cartilages were segmented both manually and semi-automatically. The values of cartilage thicknesses and volumes produced by these two methods were compared. Furthermore, the influences of possible geometrical differences on cartilage stresses and strains in the knee were evaluated with finite element modeling. The semi-automatic segmentation and 3D geometry construction of one knee joint (menisci, femoral and tibial cartilages) was approximately two times faster than with manual segmentation. Differences in cartilage thicknesses, volumes, contact pressures, stresses, and strains between segmentation methods in femoral and tibial cartilage were mostly insignificant (p>0.05) and random, i.e. there were no systematic differences between the methods. In conclusion, the devised semi-automatic segmentation method is a quick and accurate way to determine cartilage geometries; it may become a valuable tool for biomechanical modeling applications with large patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1463
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Semi-automatic knee cartilage segmentation
    Dam, Erik B.
    Folkesson, Jenny
    Pettersen, Paola C.
    Christiansen, Claus
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2006, 6144
  • [2] Semi-automatic Segmentation of Knee Osteoarthritic Cartilage in Magnetic Resonance Images
    Marstal, Kasper
    Gudbergsen, Henrik
    Boesen, Mikael
    Kubassova, Olga
    Bouert, Rasmus
    Bliddal, Henning
    53RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ELMAR-2011, 2011, : 385 - 388
  • [3] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRA-OPERATOR VARIABILITY IN MANUAL AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF KNEE CARTILAGE
    Yu, H. J.
    Chang, A.
    Fukuda, Y.
    Terada, Y.
    Yoshioka, H.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 : S296 - S297
  • [4] Swin UNETR Segmentation with Automated Geometry Filtering for Biomechanical Modeling of Knee Joint Cartilage
    Kakavand, Reza
    Tahghighi, Peyman
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Edwards, W. Brent
    Komeili, Amin
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, : 908 - 922
  • [5] A semi-automatic method for vascular image segmentation
    School of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha, China
    不详
    Proc. - Int. Conf. Image Graph., ICIG, (3-7):
  • [6] Semi-automatic Spine Segmentation Method of CT Data
    Mateusiak, Malgorzata
    Mikolajczyk, Krzysztof
    MECHATRONICS 2019: RECENT ADVANCES TOWARDS INDUSTRY 4.0, 2020, 1044 : 29 - 35
  • [7] SEraMic: A semi-automatic method for the segmentation of grain boundaries
    Podor, R.
    Goff, X. Le
    Lautru, J.
    Brau, H. P.
    Massonnet, M.
    Clavier, N.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2021, 41 (10) : 5349 - 5358
  • [8] Semi-automatic segmentation of the prostate
    Zwiggelaar, R
    Zhu, YN
    Williams, S
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2652 : 1108 - 1116
  • [9] Integration of Swin UNETR and statistical shape modeling for a semi-automated segmentation of the knee and biomechanical modeling of articular cartilage
    Reza Kakavand
    Mehrdad Palizi
    Peyman Tahghighi
    Reza Ahmadi
    Neha Gianchandani
    Samer Adeeb
    Roberto Souza
    W. Brent Edwards
    Amin Komeili
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [10] Integration of Swin UNETR and statistical shape modeling for a semi-automated segmentation of the knee and biomechanical modeling of articular cartilage
    Kakavand, Reza
    Palizi, Mehrdad
    Tahghighi, Peyman
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Gianchandani, Neha
    Adeeb, Samer
    Souza, Roberto
    Edwards, W. Brent
    Komeili, Amin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)