Effectiveness of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatic Decompensation

被引:9
|
作者
Park, Min Kyung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Yun Bin [1 ,2 ]
Moon, Hyemi [3 ]
Choi, Na Ryung [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Minseok Albert [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Heejoon [1 ,2 ]
Nam, Joon Yeul [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Eun Ju [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong-Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Su Jong [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Yoon Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Jung-Hwan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Liver Res Inst, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Liver cancer; Chemotherapy; Targeted therapy; Survival; Child-Pugh classification; PHASE-III; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; TRIAL; PROGNOSIS; EFFICACY; CRITERIA; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-021-07365-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aim Lenvatinib and sorafenib are currently available to treat patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, since the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of lenvatinib and sorafenib included only patients with Child- Pugh class A, little is known about the effectiveness of the treatments in patients with hepatic decompensation. We compared the effectiveness of lenvatinib and sorafenib in decompensated patients with unresectable HCC. Methods Consecutive patients who were classified as Child-Pugh class B or C and received lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC between November 2018 and April 2020 at a tertiary referral center were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression, best overall tumor response, and safety profiles. Results Among 94 patients, 34 received lenvatinib and 60 received sorafenib. The median OS was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-5.2): 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.3) for lenvatinib and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.4) for sorafenib. The treatment regimen was not associated with significant improvement in OS after adjusting for covariables (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54-1.54; P = 0.74). The treatment regimen was not an independent predictor of PFS (lenvatinib vs. sorafenib; aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.24; P = 0.28). HRs were maintained even after balancing with the inverse probability treatment weighting method. Objective response rates were 11.8% and 6.7% in patients receiving lenvatinib and sorafenib, respectively (P = 0.45). Ten patients in both groups (five in the lenvatinib group and five in the sorafenib group) underwent dose modification due to adverse events, and significant difference was not observed between the treatment groups (P = 0.49). Conclusion The effectiveness of lenvatinib and sorafenib was comparable for the treatment of unresectable HCC in decompensated patients.
引用
收藏
页码:4939 / 4949
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lenvatinib plus immunotherapy versus lenvatinib monotherapy in lenvatinib-insensitive patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study
    Yu, Zeyu
    Leng, Bin
    You, Ran
    Wang, Chendong
    Diao, Lingfeng
    Xu, Qingyu
    Yin, Guowen
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2025, 43 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [22] Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Kim, John J.
    McFarlane, Thomas
    Tully, Stephen
    Wong, William W. L.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2020, 25 (03): : E512 - E519
  • [23] Clinical usefulness of geriatric assessment in elderly patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib or lenvatinib therapy
    Sekiguchi, Shuhei
    Tsuchiya, Kaoru
    Yasui, Yutaka
    Inada, Kento
    Kirino, Sakura
    Yamashita, Koji
    Hayakawa, Yuka
    Osawa, Leona
    Higuchi, Mayu
    Takaura, Kenta
    Maeyashiki, Chiaki
    Kaneko, Shun
    Tamaki, Nobuharu
    Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
    Itakura, Jun
    Takahashi, Yuka
    Asahina, Yasuhiro
    Okamoto, Ryuichi
    Kurosaki, Masayuki
    Izumi, Namiki
    CANCER REPORTS, 2022, 5 (11)
  • [24] Sorafenib as second-line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Tomonari, Tetsu
    Sato, Yasushi
    Tanaka, Hironori
    Tanaka, Takahiro
    Taniguchi, Tatsuya
    Sogabe, Msasahiro
    Okamoto, Koichi
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    Muguruma, Naoki
    Takayama, Tetsuji
    JGH OPEN, 2020, 4 (06): : 1135 - 1139
  • [25] Sorafenib versus nivolumab after lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kim, Yuna
    Lee, Jae Seung
    Lee, Hye Won
    Kim, Beom Kyung
    Park, Jun Yong
    Kim, Do Young
    Ahn, Sang Hoon
    Goh, Myung Ji
    Kang, Wonseok
    Kim, Seung Up
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [26] Early Relative Change in Hepatic Function with Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hiraoka, Atsushi
    Kumada, Takashi
    Atsukawa, Masanori
    Hirooka, Masashi
    Tsuji, Kunihiko
    Ishikawa, Toru
    Takaguchi, Koichi
    Kariyama, Kazuya
    Itobayashi, Ei
    Tajiri, Kazuto
    Shimada, Noritomo
    Shibata, Hiroshi
    Ochi, Hironori
    Tada, Toshifumi
    Toyoda, Hidenori
    Nouso, Kazuhiro
    Tsutsui, Akemi
    Nagano, Takuya
    Itokawa, Norio
    Hayama, Korenobu
    Imai, Michitaka
    Joko, Kouji
    Koizumi, Yohei
    Hiasa, Yoichi
    Michitaka, Kojiro
    ONCOLOGY, 2019, 97 (06) : 334 - 340
  • [27] The comparative efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
    Trueman, David
    Liu, Yifeng
    Lucero, Melanie
    Meier, Genevieve
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [28] Current Status of Conversion Hepatectomy After Sorafenib and Lenvatinib Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Komatsu, Shohei
    Yano, Yoshihiko
    Mimura, Takuya
    Minami, Akihiro
    Momose, Kenji
    Hirano, Hirotaka
    Tanaka, Motofumi
    Ueda, Yuki
    Tai, Kentaro
    Yasuhara, Yuki
    Nakagawa, Daisuke
    Yamamoto, Atsushi
    Kido, Masahiro
    Ueda, Yoshihide
    Kodama, Yuzo
    Fukumoto, Takumi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (07) : 3097 - 3103
  • [29] Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Spallanzani, Andrea
    Orsi, Giulia
    Andrikou, Kalliopi
    Gelsomino, Fabio
    Rimini, Margherita
    Riggi, Laura
    Cascinu, Stefano
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (11) : 1069 - 1076
  • [30] Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation
    Perera, S.
    Magyar, C. T. J.
    Rajendran, L.
    Li, Z.
    Almugbel, F. A.
    Feng, S.
    Choi, W. J.
    Aceituno, L.
    Selzner, N.
    Jaeckel, E.
    Falla-Rad, N.
    Knox, J. J.
    Chen, E. X.
    O'Kane, G. M.
    Sapisochin, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S82 - S83