Evaluation of the organisation and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed-methods study

被引:16
作者
van Gelderen, Saskia C. [1 ]
Zegers, Marieke [1 ]
Boeijen, Wilma [2 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ]
Robben, Paul B. [3 ,4 ]
Wollersheim, Hub C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Sci Ctr Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dutch Hlth Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITY-OF-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; BOARD; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPROVEMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Hospital boards are legally responsible for safe healthcare. They need tools to assist them in their task of governing patient safety. Almost every Dutch hospital performs internal audits, but the effectiveness of these audits for hospital governance has never been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the organisation of internal audits and their effectiveness for hospitals boards to govern patient safety. Design and setting A mixed-methods study consisting of a questionnaire regarding the organisation of internal audits among all Dutch hospitals (n=89) and interviews with stakeholders regarding the audit process and experienced effectiveness of audits within six hospitals. Results Response rate of the questionnaire was 76% and 43 interviews were held. In every responding hospital, the internal audits followed the plan-do-check-act cycle. Every hospital used interviews, document analysis and site visits as input for the internal audit. Boards stated that effective aspects of internal audits were their multidisciplinary scope, their structured and in-depth approach, the usability to monitor improvement activities and to change hospital policy and the fact that results were used in meetings with staff and boards of supervisors. The qualitative methods (interviews and site visits) used in internal audits enable the identification of soft signals such as unsafe culture or communication and collaboration problems. Reported disadvantages were the low frequency of internal audits and the absence of soft signals in the actual audit reports. Conclusion This study shows that internal audits are regarded as effective for patient safety governance, as they help boards to identify patient safety problems, proactively steer patient safety and inform boards of supervisors on the status of patient safety. The description of the Dutch internal audits makes these audits replicable to other healthcare organisations in different settings, enabling hospital boards to complement their systems to govern patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Patient decision-making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed-methods study [J].
Strong, Emily ;
Callaghan, Tia ;
Beal, Erin ;
Moffatt, Christine ;
Wickramasekera, Nyantara ;
Brown, Steven ;
Lee, Matthew J. ;
Winton, Catherine ;
Hind, Daniel .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (06) :1487-1498
[32]   Governing patient safety: lessons learned from a mixed methods evaluation of implementing a ward-level medication safety scorecard in two English NHS hospitals [J].
Ramsay, Angus I. G. ;
Turner, Simon ;
Cavell, Gillian ;
Oborne, C. Alice ;
Thomas, Rebecca E. ;
Cookson, Graham ;
Fulop, Naomi J. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (02) :136-146
[33]   Improving Patient-Centredness in Endometriosis Care: A Study Protocol for a Prospective Study with a Mixed-Methods Approach [J].
Schreurs, Anneke M. F. ;
van Schaijik, Charlotte I. ;
De Bie, Bianca ;
Maas, Jacques W. M. ;
Lambalk, Cornelis ;
van der Houwen, Lisette E. E. ;
Mijatovic, Velja .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2021, :542-548
[34]   Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study [J].
Christalle, Eva ;
Zeh, Stefan ;
Hahlweg, Pola ;
Kriston, Levente ;
Haerter, Martin ;
Scholl, Isabelle .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10)
[35]   Surgical service monitoring and quality control systems at district hospitals in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia: a mixed-methods study [J].
Clarke, Morgane ;
Pittalis, Chiara ;
Borgstein, Eric ;
Bijlmakers, Leon ;
Cheelo, Mweene ;
Ifeanyichi, Martilord ;
Mwapasa, Gerald ;
Juma, Adinan ;
Broekhuizen, Henk ;
Drury, Grace ;
Lavy, Chris ;
Kachimba, John ;
Mkandawire, Nyengo ;
Chilonga, Kondo ;
Brugha, Ruairi ;
Gajewski, Jakub .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (12) :950-960
[36]   Evaluating the safety and patient impacts of an artificial intelligence command centre in acute hospital care: a mixed-methods protocol [J].
McInerney, Ciaran ;
McCrorie, Carolyn ;
Benn, Jonathan ;
Habli, Ibrahim ;
Lawton, Tom ;
Mebrahtu, Teumzghi F. ;
Randell, Rebecca ;
Sheikh, Naeem ;
Johnson, Owen .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03) :e054090
[37]   Impact of COVID-19 on intrapartum care at public hospitals in the Sidama region, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study [J].
Kassa, Zemenu Yohannes ;
Scarf, Vanessa ;
Turkmani, Sabera ;
Fox, Deborah .
WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 20
[38]   Patient experiences of GP-led colon cancer survivorship care: a Dutch mixed-methods evaluation [J].
Vos, Julien A. M. ;
van Miltenburg, Vera E. ;
Beverdam, Frederique H. ;
van Weert, Henk C. P. M. ;
van Asselt, Kristel M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (727) :E115-E123
[39]   Designing and evaluation of patient safety management questionnaire: A mixed method study [J].
Irani, Seyed Jalil Hosseini ;
Riahi, Leila ;
Komeili, Ali ;
Masoudi, Reza .
JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (03) :186-197
[40]   Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation [J].
Benning, Amirta ;
Ghaleb, Maisoon ;
Suokas, Anu ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
Dawson, Jeremy ;
Barber, Nick ;
Franklin, Bryony Dean ;
Girling, Alan ;
Hemming, Karla ;
Carmalt, Martin ;
Rudge, Gavin ;
Naicker, Thirumalai ;
Nwulu, Ugochi ;
Choudhury, Sopna ;
Lilford, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 :369