Evaluation of the organisation and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed-methods study

被引:15
|
作者
van Gelderen, Saskia C. [1 ]
Zegers, Marieke [1 ]
Boeijen, Wilma [2 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ]
Robben, Paul B. [3 ,4 ]
Wollersheim, Hub C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Sci Ctr Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dutch Hlth Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; BOARD; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPROVEMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Hospital boards are legally responsible for safe healthcare. They need tools to assist them in their task of governing patient safety. Almost every Dutch hospital performs internal audits, but the effectiveness of these audits for hospital governance has never been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the organisation of internal audits and their effectiveness for hospitals boards to govern patient safety. Design and setting A mixed-methods study consisting of a questionnaire regarding the organisation of internal audits among all Dutch hospitals (n=89) and interviews with stakeholders regarding the audit process and experienced effectiveness of audits within six hospitals. Results Response rate of the questionnaire was 76% and 43 interviews were held. In every responding hospital, the internal audits followed the plan-do-check-act cycle. Every hospital used interviews, document analysis and site visits as input for the internal audit. Boards stated that effective aspects of internal audits were their multidisciplinary scope, their structured and in-depth approach, the usability to monitor improvement activities and to change hospital policy and the fact that results were used in meetings with staff and boards of supervisors. The qualitative methods (interviews and site visits) used in internal audits enable the identification of soft signals such as unsafe culture or communication and collaboration problems. Reported disadvantages were the low frequency of internal audits and the absence of soft signals in the actual audit reports. Conclusion This study shows that internal audits are regarded as effective for patient safety governance, as they help boards to identify patient safety problems, proactively steer patient safety and inform boards of supervisors on the status of patient safety. The description of the Dutch internal audits makes these audits replicable to other healthcare organisations in different settings, enabling hospital boards to complement their systems to govern patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acceptance factors of digitalization in hospitals: a mixed-methods study
    Burmann, Anja
    Schepers, Susann
    Meister, Sven
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 13 (05) : 843 - 859
  • [2] Implementing Patient Falls Education in Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Trial
    Heng, Hazel
    Kiegaldie, Debra
    Shaw, Louise
    Jazayeri, Dana
    Hill, Anne-Marie
    Morris, Meg E.
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [3] A Safety Huddle Intervention in In-Patient Surgical Units: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Dahinten, V. Susan
    Kim, Eunkyung
    Lee, Sang Hwa
    Han, Soo Young
    Kim, Phill Ja
    Kim, Jung Yeon
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 2023
  • [4] Identifying the risk factors of patient safety in internet hospitals: A mixed methods study
    Liu, Sha
    Hu, Yinhuan
    Wu, Xiaoyue
    Li, Gang
    Wang, Liuming
    Zhang, Yeyan
    Zhou, Jinghan
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [5] A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Patient Safety Culture at Four VHA Hospitals
    Sullivan, Jennifer L.
    Shin, Marlena H.
    Ranusch, Allison
    Mohr, David C.
    Chen, Charity
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2024, 50 (11) : 791 - 800
  • [6] Assessing patient safety culture in 15 intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
    Tlili, Mohamed Ayoub
    Aouicha, Wiem
    Sahli, Jihene
    Ben Cheikh, Asma
    Mtiraoui, Ali
    Ajmi, Thouraya
    Zedini, Chekib
    Chelbi, Souad
    Ben Rejeb, Mohamed
    Mallouli, Manel
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Assessing patient safety culture in 15 intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
    Mohamed Ayoub Tlili
    Wiem Aouicha
    Jihene Sahli
    Asma Ben Cheikh
    Ali Mtiraoui
    Thouraya Ajmi
    Chekib Zedini
    Souad Chelbi
    Mohamed Ben Rejeb
    Manel Mallouli
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [8] Staying ahead of the curve: avigating changes and maintaining gains in patient safety culture-a mixed-methods study
    Titi, Maher Abdelraheim
    Baksh, Maram Mohammed
    Zubairi, Beena
    Abdalla, Rawia Ahmad Mustafa
    Alsaif, Faisal Abdullah
    Amer, Yasser S.
    Jamal, Diana
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [9] Patient Perceptions of Survivorship Care Plans: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Antalis, Erin Peregrine
    Doucette, Rylee
    Kuhn, Gielle
    Baker, Laurence H.
    Reinke, Denise
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (04) : 493 - 502
  • [10] Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multiple-Case Study to Examine Improvement Sustainability of Large-Scale Initiatives in Tertiary Hospitals
    Moon, Sarah E. J.
    Hogden, Anne
    Eljiz, Kathy
    Siddiqui, Nazlee
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (15)