On fractal dimensions of soil radon gas time series

被引:13
作者
Rafique, Muhammad [1 ]
Iqbal, Javid [1 ]
Shah, Syed Ahsin Ali [2 ]
Alam, Aftab [3 ]
Lone, Kashif Javed [2 ]
Barkat, Adnan [3 ]
Shah, Muhammad Ali [3 ]
Qureshi, Shahzad Ahmad [4 ]
Nikolopoulos, Dimitrios [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad, Dept Phys, King Abdullah Campus, Azad Kashmir 13100, Pakistan
[2] Univ Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, King Abdullah Campus, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
[3] Ctr Earthquake Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Pakistan Inst Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Islamabad 45650, Pakistan
[5] Univ West Attica, Dept Ind Design & Prod Engn, Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250, GR-12244 Aigaleo, Greece
关键词
Complexity measure; Lempel ziv complexity; Time series; Hurst exponent; Entropy; Fractal dimension; Katz; Sevcik; Higuchi; COMPLEXITY MEASURE; APPROXIMATE ENTROPY; HURST EXPONENT; LONG MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105775
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the complexity of soil radon time series (RTS) recorded from March 2017 to April 2018 in Pakistan via RTM 1688-2 monitor, in direct linkage to parallel series of temperature, relative humidity, and pressure. Several complexity measures are employed. The normalized Lempel Ziv Complexity (LZC) of the complete RTS is 0.30 and 0.14, 0.22, and 0.14 for the complete time series of temperature, relative humidity and pressure respectively. LZC ranges between 0.3 and 0.5 for RTS and between 0.1 and 0.3 for temperature (T), relative humidity (RH) and pressure (P). Hurst exponent (HE) values via rescaled range (R/S) analysis show an inverse relationship with LZC. HE ranges between 0.60 < HE < 0.98 for RTS, 0.60 < HE < 0.92 for T series, 0.61 < HE < 0.93 for RH series, and 0.87 < HE < 0.98 for P series. Permutation Entropy (PE) is 1.7809 for complete RTS with a minimum of 1.7668 in August 2018. Highest value of Sample Entropy (SE) is 1.3716 for February 2018. The highest symbolic Normalized Corrected Shannon Entropy (NCSE) value is found in January 2018 with a value of 0.7864. Finally, the Fractal Dimensions varied significantly for calculation with the Sevcik's, Higuchi's and Katz's methods. Common dates of below threshold areas are reported. The different aspects of the derived results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] .Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv complexity measure in the context of biomedical signal analysis
    Aboy, Mateo
    Hornero, Roberto
    Abasolo, Daniel
    Alvarez, Daniel
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (11) : 2282 - 2288
  • [2] Long-lasting patterns of radon in groundwater at Panzhihua, China: Results from DFA, fractal dimensions and residual radon concentration
    Alam, Aftab
    Wang, Nanping
    Zhao, Guofeng
    Mehmood, Tahir
    Nikolopoulos, Dimitrios
    [J]. GEOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 53 (06) : 341 - 358
  • [3] Complexity analysis of stride interval time series by threshold dependent symbolic entropy
    Aziz, Wajid
    Arif, Muhammad
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [4] Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series
    Bandt, C
    Pompe, B
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 88 (17) : 4
  • [5] Fractals and search paths in mammals
    Bascompte, J
    Vila, C
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1997, 12 (04) : 213 - 221
  • [6] Borowska M, 2005, ANN P MED SCI, V50, P29
  • [7] Measuring complexity using FuzzyEn, ApEn, and SampEn
    Chen, Weiting
    Zhuang, Jun
    Yu, Wangxin
    Wang, Zhizhong
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [8] A systematic compilation of earthquake precursors
    Cicerone, Robert D.
    Ebel, John E.
    Britton, James
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2009, 476 (3-4) : 371 - 396
  • [9] A review of symbolic analysis of experimental data
    Daw, CS
    Finney, CEA
    Tracy, ER
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2003, 74 (02) : 915 - 930
  • [10] Dutt D.N, 2010, INT J ELECT COMMUN, V4