Residential willingness to pay for deep decarbonization of electricity supply: Contingent valuation evidence from Hong Kong

被引:17
作者
Cheng, Y. S. [1 ]
Cao, K. H. [1 ]
Woo, C. K. [2 ]
Yatchew, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Asian & Policy Studies, Tai Po, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Econ, Toronto, ON M5S 3G7, Canada
关键词
Residential willingness-to-pay; Electricity decarbonization; Contingent valuation; Hong Kong; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; GREEN ELECTRICITY; STATUS-QUO; ATTRIBUTES; PREFERENCE; CHOICE; POLICY; CHINA; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Motivated by the government's proposed target of reducing CO2 emissions by 30% of the 2005 level in the year 2020, we estimate the residential willingness-to-pay (WTP) for deep decarbonization of Hong Kong's electricity supply, which is heavily dependent on coal-fired generation. Our contingent valuation survey conducted in 2016 of 1460 households yields dichotomous choice data based on the respondents' answers to a series of closed ended questions. Such data are less susceptible to the strategic bias that often plagues self-stated WIT data obtained by direct elicitation via open-ended questions. Using binary choice models, we find that average WTP is 48-51%, relative to current bills, if the decarbonization target is achieved via natural gas generation and renewable energy. However, estimated WTP declines to 32-42% when decarbonization entails additional nuclear imports from China. As the projected bill increase caused by the target's implementation is 40%, our WTP estimates support the government's fuel mix policy of using natural gas and renewable energy to displace Hong Kong's coal generation.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 227
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Bateman I., 2001, VALUING ENV PREFEREN
[2]   Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments [J].
Bergmann, A ;
Hanley, M ;
Wright, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (09) :1004-1014
[3]  
Bollino CA, 2009, ENERG J, V30, P81
[4]   Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? [J].
Borchers, Allison M. ;
Duke, Joshua M. ;
Parsons, George R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) :3327-3334
[5]   Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Johansson-Stenman, O .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (06) :661-669
[6]   Paying for Mitigation: A Multiple Country Study [J].
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Kataria, Mitesh ;
Krupnick, Alan ;
Lampi, Elina ;
Lofgren, Asa ;
Qin, Ping ;
Chung, Susie ;
Sterner, Thomas .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (02) :326-340
[7]  
Carson R., 2014, The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation
[8]  
Carson RT, 2005, HANDB ECON, V20, P821
[9]  
Champ PatriciaA., 2003, PRIMER NONMARKET VAL
[10]   Households' willingness to pay for safeguarding security of natural gas supply in electricity generation [J].
Damigos, D. ;
Tourkolias, C. ;
Diakoulaki, D. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) :2008-2017