Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization

被引:155
作者
Zimmermann, Arno W. [1 ]
Wunderlich, Johannes [1 ]
Mueller, Leonard [2 ]
Buchner, Georg A. [1 ]
Marxen, Annika [1 ]
Michailos, Stavros [3 ]
Armstrong, Katy [4 ]
Naims, Henriette [5 ]
McCord, Stephen [4 ]
Styring, Peter [4 ]
Sick, Volker [6 ]
Schomaecker, Reinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Chem, Berlin, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Tech Thermodynam, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Sheffield, Energy 2050, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Sheffield, UK Ctr Carbon Dioxide Utilizat CDUUK, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] IASS, CO2 Utilisat Strategies & Soc, Potsdam, Germany
[6] Univ Michigan, Global CO2 Initiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH | 2020年 / 8卷 / 08期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CO2; utilization; CCU; carbon capture and utilization; techno-economic assessment; TEA; standardization; harmonization; life cycle assessment; CARBON-DIOXIDE UTILIZATION; VALUE-ADDED CHEMICALS; LIFE-CYCLE; METHANOL PRODUCTION; NATURAL-GAS; UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGIES; EFFICIENT UTILIZATION; ALTERNATIVE PROCESS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; POWER-PLANTS;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) is an emerging technology field that can replace fossil carbon value chains, and that has a significant potential to achieve emissions mitigation or even "negative emissions"-however in many cases with challenging technology feasibility and economic viability. Further challenges arise in the decision making for CCU technology research, development, and deployment, in particular when allocating funding or time resources. No generally accepted techno-economic assessment (TEA) standard has evolved, and assessment studies often result in "apples vs. oranges" comparisons, a lack of transparency and a lack of comparability to other studies. A detailed guideline for systematic techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for CCU technologies was developed; this paper shows a summarized version of the TEA guideline, which includes distinct and prioritized (shall and should) rules and which allows conducting TEA in parallel to LCA. The TEA guideline was developed in a co-operative and creative approach with roughly 50 international experts and is based on a systematic literature review as well as on existing best practices from TEA and LCA from the areas of industry, academia, and policy. To the best of our knowledge, this guideline is the first TEA framework with a focus on CCU technologies and the first that is designed to be conducted in parallel to LCA due to aligned vocabulary and assessment steps, systematically including technology maturity. Therefore, this work extends current literature, improving the design, implementation, and reporting approaches of TEA studies for CCU technologies. Overall, the application of this TEA guideline aims at improved comparability of TEA studies, leading to improved decision making and more efficient allocation of funds and time resources for the research, development, and deployment of CCU technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 154 条
  • [1] Novel process technologies for conversion of carbon dioxide from industrial flue gas streams into methanol
    Abdelaziz, Omar Y.
    Hosny, Wafaa M.
    Gadalla, Mamdouh A.
    Ashour, Fatma H.
    Ashour, Ibrahim A.
    Hulteberg, Christian P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2017, 21 : 52 - 63
  • [2] ADEME and ALCIMED, 2010, PAN VOIES VAL CO2
  • [3] ADEME ENEA Consulting EReIE and ICPEES, 2014, CHEM CONV CO2 OV QUA
  • [4] Exploring the techno-economic feasibility of mine rock waste utilisation in road works: The case of a mining deposit in Ghana
    Agyeman, Stephen
    Ampadu, Samuel I. K.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [5] Comparative techno-economic assessment of biomass and coal with CCS technologies in a pulverized combustion power plant in the United Kingdom
    Al-Qayim, Khalidah
    Nimmo, William
    Pourkashanian, Mohammed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 43 : 82 - 92
  • [6] A standardized methodology for the techno-economic evaluation of alternative fuels - A case study
    Albrecht, Friedemann G.
    Koenig, Daniel H.
    Baucks, Nadine
    Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe
    [J]. FUEL, 2017, 194 : 511 - 526
  • [7] A review of scenario planning
    Amer, Muhammad
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Jetter, Antonie
    [J]. FUTURES, 2013, 46 : 23 - 40
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, INT REFERENCE LIFE C, DOI DOI 10.2788/38479
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, ANAL SYNTHESIS DESIG, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.36-0974
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1999, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering