Early detection of airway obstruction by impulse oscillometry system in methacholine challenge testing in preschool children

被引:5
作者
Yoon, Jung Won [1 ]
Sheen, Youn Ho [2 ]
Ha, Eun Kyo [3 ]
Baek, Ji Hyun [3 ]
Baek, Hey Sung [4 ]
Choi, Sun Hee [5 ]
Han, Man Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seonam Univ, Myongji Hosp, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea
[2] CHA Univ, CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Pediat, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Impulse Oscillation; Dose-response Slope; Bronchial hyperresponsiveness; Spirometry; auscultation method; LUNG-FUNCTION; BRONCHIAL CHALLENGE; OSCILLATION TECHNIQUE; FORCED OSCILLATION; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG-CHILDREN; REACTANCE; AUSCULTATION; SPIROMETRY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.12932/AP-290617-0108
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Small airway hyperresponsiveness is a critical aspect in preschool children with asthmatic symptoms in terms of asthma control. The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship of changes in reactance (Xrs) and resistance (Rrs) of iOS and FEV1 with those in clinical parameters and to determine which IOS parameter is correlated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness before positive clinical endpoints. Methods: We performed the methacholine challenge test in ninety-four preschool children (4.2 +/- 1.1 years) with suspected asthma. The end of test (EOT) was defined as one or more of the following: audible wheezing (PCw(+)), a fall in the oxygen saturation (< 92%, PCs+) or development of respiratory symptoms (PCr+). Results: Mean changes in FEV1, Xrs(5), and Rrs(5) in the EOT group were 39.2 +/- 14.3% (95% CI 35.1-43.2%), 176.8 +/- 78.0 (95% CI 154.9-198.8) and 53.6 +/- 30.2 (45.1-62.0), respectively. The changes of Xrs(5) in three EOT+ groups exceeded 80% and were lowest in PCr+(median, 95.9, IQR; 73.4 to 132.4), followed by PCw(+) and PCs+. However, Rrs(5) did not show greater than 40% changes in PCr+. Xrs(5) showed a higher correlation with changes in saturation (r = -0.578) than Rrs(5) (r=-0.426). A49% decrease in Xrs(5) was the optimal point for predicting a 80% change of Xrs(5) at the following step. Conclusion: When examining the 5 step methacholine challenge test in preschoolers, the use of clinical parameters alone as an endpoint is of little value. The reactance value of 5 Hz is a useful predictive marker for bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Evaluation of impulse oscillometry during bronchial challenge testing in children
    Bailly, Carole
    Crenesse, Dominique
    Albertini, Marc
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2011, 46 (12) : 1209 - 1214
  • [2] Methacholine bronchial provocation measured by spirometry versus wheeze detection in preschool children
    Bentur L.
    Beck R.
    Elias N.
    Barak A.
    Efrati O.
    Yahav Y.
    Vilozni D.
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 5 (1)
  • [3] An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Pulmonary function testing in preschool children
    Beydon, Nicole
    Davis, Stephanie D.
    Lombardi, Enrico
    Allen, Julian L.
    Arets, Hubertus G. M.
    Aurora, Paul
    Bisgaard, Hans
    Davis, G. Michael
    Ducharme, Francine M.
    Eigen, Howard
    Gappa, Monika
    Gaultier, Claude
    Gustafsson, Per M.
    Hall, Graham L.
    Hantos, Zoltan
    Healy, Michael J. R.
    Jones, Marcus H.
    Klug, Bent
    Carlsen, Karin C. Lodrup
    McKenzie, Sheila A.
    Marchal, Francois
    Mayer, Oscar H.
    Merkus, Peter J. F. M.
    Morris, Mohy G.
    Oostveen, Ellie
    Pillow, J. Jane
    Seddon, Paul C.
    Silverman, Michael
    Sly, Peter D.
    Stocks, Janet
    Tepper, Robert S.
    Vilozni, Daphna
    Wilson, Nicola M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 175 (12) : 1304 - 1345
  • [4] Dose-response slope of forced oscillation and forced expiratory parameters in bronchial challenge testing
    Bohadana, AB
    Peslin, R
    Megherbi, SE
    Teculescu, D
    Sauleau, EA
    Wild, P
    Pham, QT
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (02) : 295 - 300
  • [5] Bouaziz N, 1996, PEDIATR PULM, V22, P7, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199607)22:1<7::AID-PPUL2>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-P
  • [7] Bronchial challenge, assessed with forced expiratory manoeuvres and airway impedance
    Broeders, MEAC
    Molema, J
    Hop, WCJ
    Folgering, HTM
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 99 (08) : 1046 - 1052
  • [8] International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma
    Chung, Kian Fan
    Wenzel, Sally E.
    Brozek, Jan L.
    Bush, Andrew
    Castro, Mario
    Sterk, Peter J.
    Adcock, Ian M.
    Bateman, Eric D.
    Bel, Elisabeth H.
    Bleecker, Eugene R.
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Brightling, Christopher
    Chanez, Pascal
    Dahlen, Sven-Erik
    Djukanovic, Ratko
    Frey, Urs
    Gaga, Mina
    Gibson, Peter
    Hamid, Qutayba
    Jajour, Nizar N.
    Mauad, Thais
    Sorkness, Ronald L.
    Teague, W. Gerald
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 43 (02) : 343 - 373
  • [9] Methacholine Challenge Methods
    Cockcroft, Donald W.
    [J]. CHEST, 2008, 134 (04) : 678 - 680
  • [10] DUIVERMAN EJ, 1986, B EUR PHYSIOPATH RES, V22, P433