ECT augmentation of clozapine for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:74
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Wei [3 ]
Li, Xian-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shi-Bin [4 ,5 ]
Cai, Dong-Bin [6 ]
Yang, Xin-Hu [3 ]
Ungvari, Gabor S. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Xiang, Yu-Tao [10 ]
Correll, Christoph U. [11 ,12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anding Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anding Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mental Disorders, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Brain Hosp, Guangzhou Huiai Hosp, Guangzhou Brain Hosp, Guangzhou 510370, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Gen Hosp, Guangdong Mental Hlth Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Shenzhen Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Marian Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
[8] Graylands Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[9] Univ Western Australia, Med Sch, Div Psychiat, Perth, WA, Australia
[10] Univ Macau, Fac Hlth Sci, Unit Psychiat, Macau, Peoples R China
[11] Northwell Hlth, Dept Psychiat, Zucker Hillside Hosp, Glen Oaks, NY USA
[12] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Mol Med, Hempstead, NY USA
[13] Charite, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Berlin, Germany
关键词
ECT; Clozapine; Treatment-resistant; Schizophrenia; Memory; Headache; Response; Remission; ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY; ANTIPSYCHOTIC-DRUGS; EFFICACY; QUALITY; TOLERABILITY; STRATEGIES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.002
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is common and debilitating. A subgroup of patients even has clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) augmentation of clozapine for CRS. Systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on ECT augmentation of clozapine in CRS. Co-primary outcomes included symptomatic improvement at post-ECT assessment and study endpoint. Eighteen RCTs (n = 1769) with 20 active treatment arms were identified and meta-analyzed. Adjunctive ECT was superior to clozapine regarding symptomatic improvement at post-ECT assessment (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -0.88, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -1.33 to -0.44; I-2 = 86%, P = 0.0001) and endpoint assessment (SMD: -1.44, 95%CI: -2.05 to -0.84; I-2 = 95%, P < 0.00001), separating as early as week 1-2 (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI: -0.88 to 0.20; I-2 = 77%, P = 0.002). Adjunctive ECT was also superior regarding study-defined response at post-ECT assessment (53.6% vs. 25.4%, Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.59-2.36; I-2 = 0%, P < 0.00001, number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 3, 95%CI: 3-5) and endpoint assessment (67.7% vs. 41.4%, RR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.38-1.99; I-2 = 47%, P < 0.00001, NNT = 4, 95%CI: 3-8), and remission at post-ECT assessment (13.3% vs. 3.7%, RR = 3.28, 95%CI: 1.80-5.99; I-2 = 0%, P = 0.0001, NNT = 13, 95%CI: 6-100) and endpoint assessment (23.6% vs. 13.3%, RR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.39 to 2.35; I-2 = 5%, P < 0.0001, NNT = 14, 95%CI: 6-50). Patient-reported memory impairment (24.2% vs. 0%; RR = 16.10 (95%CI: 4.53-57.26); I-2 = 0%, P < 0.0001, number-needed-to-harm (NNH) = 4, 95%CI: 2-14) and headache (14.5% vs 1.6%; RR = 4.03 (95%CI: 1.54-10.56); I-2 = 0%, P = 0.005, NNH = 8, 95%CI: 4-50) occurred more frequently with adjunctive ECT. No significant group differences were found regarding discontinuation and other adverse effects. Despite increased frequency of self-reported memory impairment and headache, ECT augmentation of clozapine is a highly effective and relatively safe treatment for CRS. Registration number: CRD42018089959
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Ahmed S, 2017, HELIYON, V3, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00429
[2]  
Andreasen N.C., 1983, Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)
[3]  
Andreasen NC, 1984, Psychiatrie & Psychobiologie, DOI [10.1037/t48377-000, DOI 10.1037/T48377-000]
[4]  
[Anonymous], MED J CHINESE PEOPLE
[5]  
[Anonymous], MED J CHINESE PEOPLE
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN PSYCHOL MED
[7]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[8]   Comparative effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia: What have real-world trials taught us? [J].
Azizah Attard ;
David M. Taylor .
CNS Drugs, 2012, 26 (6) :491-508
[9]   International trends in clozapine use: a study in 17 countries [J].
Bachmann, C. J. ;
Aagaard, L. ;
Bernardo, M. ;
Brandt, L. ;
Cartabia, M. ;
Clavenna, A. ;
Coma Fuste, A. ;
Furu, K. ;
Garuoliene, K. ;
Hoffmann, F. ;
Hollingworth, S. ;
Huybrechts, K. F. ;
Kalverdijk, L. J. ;
Kawakami, K. ;
Kieler, H. ;
Kinoshita, T. ;
Lopez, S. C. ;
Machado-Alba, J. E. ;
Machado-Duque, M. E. ;
Mahesri, M. ;
Nishtala, P. S. ;
Piovani, D. ;
Reutfors, J. ;
Saastamoinen, L. K. ;
Sato, I. ;
Schuiling-Veninga, C. C. M. ;
Shyu, Y. -C. ;
Siskind, D. ;
Skurtveit, S. ;
Verdoux, H. ;
Wang, L. -J. ;
Yahni, C. Zara ;
Zoega, H. ;
Taylor, D. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 136 (01) :37-51
[10]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406