Survey results of US radiation oncology providers' contextual engagement of watch-and-wait beliefs after a complete clinical response to chemoradiation in patients with local rectal cancer

被引:10
作者
Yahya, Jehan [1 ]
Herzig, Daniel [2 ]
Farrell, Matthew [1 ]
Degnin, Catherine [3 ]
Chen, Yiyi [1 ]
Holland, John [1 ]
Brown, Simon [1 ]
Binder, Christina [1 ]
Jaboin, Jerry [1 ]
Tsikitis, Vassiliki Liana [2 ]
Nabavizadeh, Nima [1 ]
Thomas, Charles R., Jr. [1 ]
Mitin, Timur [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Radiat Med, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,L337, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gastrointest & Gen Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Knight Canc Inst, Dept Biostat, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Rectal neoplasm; total mesorectal excision (TME); non-surgical management; multidisciplinary; radiotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21037/jgo.2018.08.02
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Watchful waiting in rectal cancer patients with a complete clinical response (cCR) to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) forgo upfront resection has been proposed. Growing evidence suggests that a watch-and-wait approach using resection for salvage of local recurrence may improve quality of life without jeopardizing outcomes. The current acceptance of watch-and-wait by US radiation oncologists (ROs) is unknown. Methods: US ROs completed our IRB-approved anonymous e-survey regarding non-surgical management of patients who achieved a cCR to neoadjuvant CRT. Self-ranked knowledge of the OnCoRe Project-UK prospective observational study of watch-and-wait-was tested for its association with ROs' attitudes using the Chi-squared or Fisher's test, as indicated. Supporters of observation are self-identified. Results: Of the 220 respondents, 48% (n=106) of respondents support watchful waiting and 48% claimed familiarity with the OnCoRe Project. Respondents supporting observation were more likely to be familiar with the publication (P=0.029). Among watch-and-wait supporters, 59% (n=62) felt comfortable discussing this approach and 41% preferred the conversation be initiated by other specialists. There was no association between comfort level in discussing watch-and-wait and familiarity with the OnCoRe Project. ROs treating more than 10 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients annually felt more comfortable discussing watch-and-wait (P=0.015) compared to ROs seeing fewer patients. Conclusions: Almost half of surveyed US ROs support watch-and-wait, though many do not feel comfortable discussing this paradigm with patients. Knowledge of the OnCoRe Project is associated with support of watch-and-wait, yet not comfort level in leading the discussion. These results inform provider attitudes toward future clinical study participation.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1132
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study [J].
Appelt, Ane L. ;
Ploen, John ;
Harling, Henrik ;
Jensen, Frank S. ;
Jensen, Lars H. ;
Jorgensen, Jens C. R. ;
Lindebjerg, Jan ;
Rafaelsen, Soren R. ;
Jakobsen, Anders .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (08) :919-927
[2]   Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an Australasian perspective [J].
Behrenbruch, Cori ;
Ryan, Jennifer ;
Lynch, Craig ;
Wynn, Gregory ;
Heriot, Alexander .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (03) :103-104
[3]   Nonoperative Approach to Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Combined Modality Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities From a Surgical Perspective [J].
Fischkoff, Katherine N. ;
Ruby, Jeannine A. ;
Guillem, Jose G. .
CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (04) :291-297
[4]   Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy - Long-term results [J].
Habr-Gama, A ;
Perez, RO ;
Nadalin, W ;
Sabbaga, J ;
Ribeiro, U ;
Sousa, AHSE ;
Campos, FG ;
Kiss, DR ;
Gama-Rodrigues, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (04) :711-717
[5]   Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy [J].
Habr-Gama, Angelita ;
Perez, Rodrigo O. ;
Proscurshim, Igor ;
Campos, Fabio G. ;
Nadalin, Wladimir ;
Kiss, Desiderio ;
Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (10) :1319-1328
[6]   Watch and Wait Approach Following Extended Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Distal Rectal Cancer: Are We Getting Closer to Anal Cancer Management? [J].
Habr-Gama, Angelita ;
Sabbaga, Jorge ;
Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim ;
Sao Juliao, Guilherme P. ;
Proscurshim, Igor ;
Aguilar, Patricia Bailao ;
Nadalin, Wladimir ;
Perez, Rodrigo O. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (10) :1109-1117
[7]   CANCER OF THE ANAL-CANAL - MODEL FOR PREOPERATIVE ADJUVANT COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY [J].
LEICHMAN, L ;
NIGRO, N ;
VAITKEVICIUS, VK ;
CONSIDINE, B ;
BUROKER, T ;
BRADLEY, G ;
SEYDEL, HG ;
OLCHOWSKI, S ;
CUMMINGS, G ;
LEICHMAN, C ;
BAKER, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (02) :211-215
[8]   Organ-Preserving Strategies for the Management of Near-Complete Responses in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation [J].
Lynn, Patricio B. ;
Strombom, Paul ;
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio .
CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2017, 30 (05) :395-403
[9]   Radical Cistectomy is the best choice for most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Opinion: No [J].
Mitin, Timur .
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2017, 43 (02) :188-191
[10]   Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis [J].
Renehan, Andrew G. ;
Malcomson, Lee ;
Emsley, Richard ;
Gollins, Simon ;
Maw, Andrew ;
Myint, Arthur Sun ;
Rooney, Paul S. ;
Susnerwala, Shabbir ;
Blower, Anthony ;
Saunders, Mark P. ;
Wilson, Malcolm S. ;
Scott, Nigel ;
O'Dwyer, Sarah T. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (02) :174-183