Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption

被引:319
作者
Athey, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Imbens, Guido W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] SIEPR, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
Staggered adoption design; Difference-In-Differences; Fixed effects; Randomization distribution; ROBUST STANDARD ERRORS; INFERENCE; IDENTIFICATION; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we study estimation of and inference for average treatment effects in a setting with panel data. We focus on the staggered adoption setting where units, e.g, individuals, firms, or states, adopt the policy or treatment of interest at a particular point in time, and then remain exposed to this treatment at all times afterwards. We take a design perspective where we investigate the properties of estimators and procedures given assumptions on the assignment process. We show that under random assignment of the adoption date the standard Difference-In-Differences (DID) estimator is an unbiased estimator of a particular weighted average causal effect. We characterize the exact finite sample properties of this estimand, and show that the standard variance estimator is conservative. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 79
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   SAMPLING-BASED VERSUS DESIGN-BASED UNCERTAINTY IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2020, 88 (01) :265-296
[3]   Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) :493-505
[4]  
Abadie Alberto, 2016, SHOULD YOU ADJUST ST
[5]  
Abbring JH, 2007, HBK ECON, V2, P5145, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4412(07)06072-2
[6]   The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models [J].
Abbring, JH ;
Van den Berg, GJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (05) :1491-1517
[7]  
Angrist J. D., 1999, HDB LABOR EC A, P1277, DOI [10.1016/51573-4463(99)03004-7, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03004-7]
[8]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Trajectory balancing: A general reweighting approach to causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data
[10]  
ARELLANO M, 1987, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V49, P431