Stakeholder experiences of using online spatial data visualisation tools for local public health decision support: A qualitative study

被引:6
作者
Armstrong-Moore, Roxanne [1 ]
White, Martin [1 ]
Burgoine, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, UKCRC Ctr Diet & Act Res CEDAR, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Sch Clin Med,Inst Metab Sci, Box 285,Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Health behaviours; Online spatial data visualisation tools; Acceptability; Decision-support; Qualitative methods; NEOGEOGRAPHY; IMPACT; POLICY; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102648
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The distribution of food outlets within towns and cities and the provision of active travel infrastructure have been associated with health behaviours that can contribute to obesity risk. Decision-makers describe a lack of local data and research evidence as a barrier to policy adoption to improve the public's health. Online spatial data visualisation tools created by researchers can help to bridge this gap. We explored stakeholder experiences of using such tools for decision-support, with a focus on facilitators and barriers to use. We conducted 16 qualitative interviews with Public Health, Planning and Transport Planning professionals, who had used two recentlydeveloped tools. Participants described the importance of tools being open access; their use in "story-telling", particularly to non-experts; and more broadly their use even when imperfect. They expressed that 'robustness' of underpinning data was important, however this was not easily defined. Participants employed personal heuristics, principally based on endorsement and developer credibility, to determine suitability for use. We present key learning points for future developers to maximise engagement and impact.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
MacEachren A.M., 2001, Information Design Journal, V10, P26, DOI DOI 10.1075/IDJ.10.1.06MAC
[22]  
Marshall N., 10 TOP TIPS SOCIAL S
[23]   Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact [J].
McGill, Rory ;
Anwar, Elspeth ;
Orton, Lois ;
Bromley, Helen ;
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion ;
O'Flaherty, Martin ;
Taylor-Robinson, David ;
Guzman-Castillo, Maria ;
Gillespie, Duncan ;
Moreira, Patricia ;
Allen, Kirk ;
Hyseni, Lirije ;
Calder, Nicola ;
Petticrew, Mark ;
White, Martin ;
Whitehead, Margaret ;
Capewell, Simon .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
[24]   Data visualisation to support obesity policy: case studies of data tools for planning and transport policy in the UK [J].
Monsivais, Pablo ;
Francis, Oliver ;
Lovelace, Robin ;
Chang, Michael ;
Strachan, Emma ;
Burgoine, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2018, 42 (12) :1977-1986
[25]  
NHS Digital, 2017, Health survey for England 2017 adult health
[26]   Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for Health Promotion and Public Health: A Review [J].
Nykiforuk, Candace I. J. ;
Flaman, Laura M. .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2011, 12 (01) :63-73
[27]   The dos and don'ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics [J].
Oliver, Kathryn ;
Cairney, Paul .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 5 (1)
[28]   A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers [J].
Oliver, Kathryn ;
Innvar, Simon ;
Lorenc, Theo ;
Woodman, Jenny ;
Thomas, James .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[29]   Defining 'evidence' in public health: a survey of policymakers' uses and preferences [J].
Oliver, Kathryn A. ;
de Vocht, Frank .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27 :112-117
[30]   The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review [J].
Orton, Lois ;
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion ;
Taylor-Robinson, David ;
O'Flaherty, Martin ;
Capewell, Simon .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07)