Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides?

被引:91
作者
Zia, Asim [1 ]
Todd, Anne Marie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Community Dev & Appl Econ, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] San Jose State Univ, Dept Commun Studies, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
agenda setting; climate change; cultural models; environmental communication; framing risk; risk communication; science communication; MENTAL MODELS; UNITED-STATES; BUTTER; GUNS; DEFENSE; EXPENDITURES; DISCOURSES; POLITICS; CULTURES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1177/0963662509357871
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
While ideology can have a strong effect on citizen understanding of science, it is unclear how ideology interacts with other complicating factors, such as college education, which influence citizens' comprehension of information. We focus on public understanding of climate change science and test the hypotheses: [H-1] as citizens' ideology shifts from liberal to conservative, concern for global warming decreases; [H-2] citizens with college education and higher general science literacy tend to have higher concern for global warming; and [H-3] college education does not increase global warming concern for conservative ideologues. We implemented a survey instrument in California's San Francisco Bay Area, and employed regression models to test the effects of ideology and other socio-demographic variables on citizen concern about global warming, terrorism, the economy, health care and poverty. We are able to confirm H-1 and H-3, but reject H-2. Various strategies are discussed to improve the communication of climate change science across ideological divides.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 761
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Guns versus butter - A multisectoral approach to military expenditure and growth with evidence from Greece, 1960-1993 [J].
Antonakis, N .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1999, 43 (04) :501-520
[2]  
Axelrod R., 1976, Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
[3]  
Bingham S, 2007, CREATING A CLIMATE FOR CHANGE: COMMUNICATING CLIMATE CHANGE AND FACILITATING SOCIAL CHANGE, P153
[4]   In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? [J].
Bord, RJ ;
O'Connor, RE ;
Fisher, A .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2000, 9 (03) :205-218
[5]   WHAT DO PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT GLOBAL CLIMATE-CHANGE .1. MENTAL MODELS [J].
BOSTROM, A ;
MORGAN, MG ;
FISCHHOFF, B ;
READ, D .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :959-970
[6]   NEW PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF DEFENSE AND WELFARE EXPENDITURES IN 4 MODERN DEMOCRACIES - 1950-1970 [J].
CAPUTO, DA .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1975, 6 (04) :423-446
[7]   A decision theoretic model of public opinion: Guns, butter, and European common defense [J].
Carrubba, CJ ;
Singh, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 48 (02) :218-231
[8]   Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change [J].
Carvalho, Anabela .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (02) :223-243
[9]   Mapping consumers' mental models with ZMET [J].
Christensen, GL ;
Olson, JC .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2002, 19 (06) :477-501
[10]   Trading butter for guns - Domestic imperatives for foreign policy substitution [J].
Clark, DH .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2001, 45 (05) :636-660