Land use policy and employment growth- evidence from China

被引:5
作者
Wang, Qiao [1 ]
Liu, Xiuyan [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Sam Hak Kan [3 ]
Du, Cong [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 2 Southeast Univ Rd, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Natl Sch Dev & Policy, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Western Australia, Business Sch, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, Australia
关键词
Land use policy; Floor area ratio regulation; Employment growth; Latitude; Earthquake protection; HOUSING PRICES; URBAN-GROWTH; DETERMINANTS; DENSITY; RESTRICTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102546
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper examines the causal effect of land use policy on employment growth in Chinese cities. We find that a stricter Floor Area Ratio Regulation (FARR) leads to a reduction in employment growth in Chinese cities-a one percentage point reduction in FARR leads to a concurrent reduction of employment growth by 1.0-1.5 percentage points. More populated cities and labour-intensive manufacturing industries are found to be more severely affected by stricter FARR. Moreover, the effect of a stricter FARR is found to be less pronounced on state-owned firms compared to foreign-owned and privately-owned firms. Our main conclusions are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests, different instruments and alternative estimators. They suggest that imposing a stricter legal FARR incurs considerable employment costs for Chinese cities.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   ESTIMATING LINEAR STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, TW .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1984, 12 (01) :1-45
[2]   The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. ;
Pischke, Joern-Steffen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (02) :3-30
[3]  
Annez PatriciaClarke y., 2010, An Agenda for Research on Urbanization in Developing Countries
[4]  
Baum-Snow N., 2015, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, V5, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00001-5, 10.1016/B9780-444-59517-1.00001-5, DOI 10.1016/B9780-444-59517-1.00001-5]
[5]   Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs [J].
Bertaud, A ;
Brueckner, JK .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2005, 35 (02) :109-125
[6]  
Bertaud A., 2010, Land markets, government interventions, and housing affordability
[7]   Stringency of land-use regulation: Building heights in US cities [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Singh, Ruchi .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2020, 116
[8]   Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Fu, Shihe ;
Gu, Yizhen ;
Zhang, Junfu .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2017, 99 (04) :663-677
[9]   Measuring welfare gains from relaxation of land-use restrictions: The case of India's building-height limits [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Sridhar, Kala Seetharam .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (06) :1061-1067
[10]   Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies [J].
Brueckner, JK .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2000, 23 (02) :160-171