Implementing Advance Care Planning for dialysis patients: HIGHway project

被引:3
作者
de Sosa, Giselle Rodriguez [1 ]
Nicklas, Amanda [2 ]
Thamer, Mae [3 ]
Anderson, Elizabeth [4 ]
Reddy, Naveena [5 ]
Stevelos, JoAnn [2 ]
Germain, Michael J. [6 ]
Unruh, Mark L. [1 ]
Lupu, Dale E. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Med, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Nursing, Washington, DC USA
[3] Med Technol & Practice Patterns Inst, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Pacific Inst Res & Evaluat, Cullowhee, NC USA
[5] Support Kidney Care, Springfield, MA 01107 USA
[6] Renal & Transplant Associates New England PC, Springfield, MA 01107 USA
[7] George Washington Univ, Ctr Aging Hlth & Humanities, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Advance Care Planning; Social workers; Dialysis patients; Implementation research; Patient- centered care; Shared decision making; Supportive care; END; PREFERENCES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-022-01011-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing hemodialysis have a high mortality rate and yet underutilize palliative care and hospice resources. The Shared Decision Making-Renal Supportive Care (SDM-RSC) intervention focused on goals of care conversations between patients and family members with the nephrologist and social worker. The intervention targeted deficiencies in communication, estimating prognosis, and transition planning for seriously ill dialysis patients. The intervention showed capacity to increase substantially completion of advance care directives. The HIGHway Project, adapted from the previous SDM-RSC, scale up training social workers or nurses in dialysis center in advance care planning (ACP), and then support them for a subsequent 9-month action period, to engage in ACP conversations with patients at their dialysis center regarding their preferences for end-of-life care. Methods: We will train between 50-60 dialysis teams, led by social workers or nurses, to engage in ACP conversations with patients at their dialysis center regarding their preferences for end-of-life care. This implementation project uses the Knowledge to Action (KTA) Framework within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to increase adoption and sustainability in the participating dialysis centers. This includes a curriculum about how to hold ACP conversation and coaching with monthly teleconferences through case discussion and mentoring. An application software will guide on the process and provide resources for holding ACP conversations. Our project will focus on implementation outcomes. Success will be determined by adoption and effective use of the ACP approach. Patient and provider outcomes will be measured by the number of ACP conversations held and documented; the quality and fidelity of ACP conversations to the HIGHway process as taught during education sessions; impact on knowledge and skills; content, relevance, and significance of ACP intervention for patients, and Supportive Kidney Care (SKC) App usage. Currently HIGHway is in the recruitment stage. Discussion: Effective changes to advance care planning processes in dialysis centers can lead to institutional policy and protocol changes, providing a model for patients receiving dialysis treatment in the US. The result will be a widespread improvement in advance care planning, thereby remedying one of the current barriers to patient-centered, goal-concordant care for dialysis patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Advance Care Planning: A Communitarian Approach? [J].
Chan, Tracey Evans .
JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (04) :896-921
[42]   Advance directives by children and parents - Advance care planning in pediatrics [J].
Jox, R. J. ;
Fuehrer, M. ;
Borasio, G. D. .
MONATSSCHRIFT KINDERHEILKUNDE, 2009, 157 (01) :26-32
[43]   Process and impact of an advance care planning intervention evaluated by bereaved surrogate decision-makers of dialysis patients [J].
Song, Mi-Kyung ;
Metzger, Maureen ;
Ward, Sandra E. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (03) :267-274
[44]   Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review [J].
Fahner, Jurrianne C. ;
Beunders, Alexandra J. M. ;
van der Heide, Agnes ;
Rietjens, Judith A. C. ;
Vanderschuren, Maaike M. ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. ;
Kars, Marijke C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 20 (03) :227-248
[45]   Advance care planning dispositions: the relationship between knowledge and perception [J].
Kleiner, Anne Cattagni ;
Santos-Eggimann, Brigitte ;
Fustinoni, Sarah ;
Durst, Anne-Veronique ;
Haunreiter, Katja ;
Rubli-Truchard, Eve ;
Seematter-Bagnoud, Laurence .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)
[46]   Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey [J].
Sudore, Rebecca L. ;
Heyland, Daren K. ;
Barnes, Deborah E. ;
Howard, Michelle ;
Fassbender, Konrad ;
Robinson, Carole A. ;
Boscardin, John ;
You, John J. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (04) :669-+
[47]   Advance care planning for patients with inoperable lung cancer [J].
Horne, Gillian ;
Seymour, Jane ;
Shepherd, Karen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2006, 12 (04) :172-178
[48]   Advance Care Planning in Patients With Stroke: A Scoping Review [J].
Yang, Mengfei ;
Li, Ning ;
Mei, Yongxia .
NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2025, 27 (02)
[49]   Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study [J].
Sarah L. Goff ;
Mark L. Unruh ;
Jamie Klingensmith ;
Nwamaka D. Eneanya ;
Casey Garvey ;
Michael J. Germain ;
Lewis M. Cohen .
BMC Palliative Care, 18
[50]   Nurses' views regarding implementing advance care planning for older people: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies [J].
Ke, Li-Shan ;
Huang, Xiaoyan ;
O'Connor, Margaret ;
Lee, Susan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2015, 24 (15-16) :2057-2073